I find that comment extremely strange junkie, are you saying that with the exception of genetalia males and females are the same in your eyes? To be truthful I dont think that you do, I just think that despite the fact that you editted your post you still haven't thought it through. That or you're very naive

 

 

i edited my post because of misspelling. i do it all the time (although i admit i can never catch them all). but, nonetheless, i mean what i say. aside from physical differences (including biochemical differences), guys and gals are first and foremost, individuals. and what are individuals composed off?? personality, emotions, mental/psychological abilities and tendancies, etc. when we fall in love with someone, we fall in love with the individual. on the other hand, we lust after the physical being. sure, in terms of individuals, guys and gals tend to develop certain traits, but there really is no concrete division of how guys and gals develop as individuals. if one can admire and appreciate a female for possessing a composition of certain traits, then theoretically, that individual should also be able to admire and appreciate a male for possessing the same composition of traits. but of course it's not that simple. psychological and sociological upbringing and societal expectation conditions us to develop certain feelings only for the individuals that we are also physically attracted to. so for a heterosexual male, we may fall in love with a woman for possessing a composition of certain traits, but when it comes to a man who possesses a similar composition of traits, although we may still admire and appreciate him for those traits, we would not technically fall in "love" with him, even though if you take away the physical differences, the two individuals may be quite similar. this is the same reason why it is easier for one to fall in love with a beautiful woman with certain traits as opposed to an uglier woman with similar, if not nearly identical, traits. as for the physical part, there are indeed many physical differences between a male and a female, but the most prominent differentiation is in the genetalia, and the breast. when we look at pornographic photos, where do our attention gravitate to most frequently?? most likely the breast and the genetalia. the reason for that is because for a heterosexual male, those are the parts of the female body that appeals to us the most, and the parts that we lust after the most. of course this is not to say that all the rest of the male and female anatomy are identical and irrelevant, for i'm aware and agree that there are subtle features of a woman's arms and legs, for example, that make them more appealing to a heterosexual man, than that of a male's. nonetheless, assuming you were blindfolded and you were told or allowed yourself to believe that a woman was performing oral sex on you (without using her hands), but when in fact it is a male that was performing the oral sex on you, would you actually be able to tell the difference and not enjoy the experience?? well assuming that this male was equally skilled in performing oral sex as a typical female would be, then probably no. so does this mean you are a homosexual?? no. and what does this tell you?? well, it tells you that for the most part, a good blowjob is a good blowjob and that the only reason you would be repulsed by having a guy perform one on you is more or less psychologically influenced, and has nothing to do with the fact that there are indeed any real and major differences in a guy's vs. gal's mouth. this analogy can be extended to include anal sex. if you feel aroused and enjoy peforming anal sex on a female, then really what is keeping you from enjoying anal sex with another male other your psychological self?? again assuming you are not allowed to use your sight or your hands, and assuming that the guy doesn't have a hairy ass, will you actually be able to tell the difference and enjoy one experience less than the other?? probably not. so what i'm trying to get at is that anal sex really is just anal sex, and that the main difference between having anal sex with a male as opposed to a female is psychologically influenced. to further elaborate on this thought, we've all heard about prison sex where one male inmate forces anal penetration onto another male inmate. now, some of these guys are probably a lot tougher and more masculine than you and i, but just based on the fact that this male inmate is able to succumb to allow himself to stick his c*ck into another guy, does that make him a homosexual?? i would say no. sure, prision sex is a lot more involved than merely sexual satifaction. some would say there is physical, emotional, and psychological intimidation involved. others would say that these inmate are sexually deprived and desperate, but still. the bottom line is that anal penetration is anal penetration, and that the main difference between anal penetration with a male vs. a female is psychological interference, which brings back to my original point where if one enjoys and is aroused by anal sex with a female, they might as well not inhibit themselves and go ahead and perform them on any sex, cuz all sexes have anuses after all.

 

If you really expect anyone to read that essay you might want to chuck about 345 paragraphs in there and possibly a couple of chapters

 

nice rebuttal...

oh sorry, i had to edit this. i'm just naive...

 

Sorry if Im coming across as an arsehole, Im in a shit mood and couldn't be bothered sugar coating the fact that your response was illegible due to its format

Did you really think that it would only take me 4 mins to decipher your code?

 

This is funny.

 

I always wanted to change my name to "Buster Hymen"

 

Say what?!

 

right click "save as background".