Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

How much is 92 NSX with 64000miles?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 26, 2001 | 04:45 PM
  #11  
RicePimp's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
From: Beaverton
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by S TWO K
[B]
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2001 | 05:01 PM
  #12  
Elistan's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,323
Likes: 28
From: Longmont, CO
Default

Originally posted by RicePimp


Actually pretty good. The exterior looked perfect, and the interior was OK. There was some issue with the transmission (broken mount or something) that was supposed to cost like $7000 to fix. A friend of his who had experience racing NSX's knew of another part that cost $100 that could be used in it's place if you had the tools to install it. I drove the car before that was fixed and didn't notice anything wrong. He first saw the car selling for $20k, I believe, from some lady that couldn't afford to fix the car, and she accepted his offer for $16k. Some people just get lucky. He uses it as a daily driver and hasn't had any problems with it since he got it (5 months ago, roughly).
Was that the snap ring failure problem?
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2001 | 06:51 PM
  #13  
SCS2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
Default

If it was the snap ring there is no permanent fix other than replacing the entire transmission case. You can temporarily repair it with a new snap ring but it will eventually give way and break also.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2001 | 11:46 AM
  #14  
RicePimp's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
From: Beaverton
Default

Originally posted by Elistan


Was that the snap ring failure problem?
I don't know, it was something with the transmission. I had something to do with a mount or the casing, so that may very well be it. The guy that helped him fix it was very experienced with the NSX and replaced it with a different part that he claimed was better than OEM. I have very little knowledge about the NSX, so I really can't really go into any more detail without completely talking out of my ass... Another member here, elanderholm works with the guy, so I'll try to get him to post if he knows any more details. I can tell you that he got a damn good deal, even if he has to fix this right for several grand some day. The car felt fine when I drove it even with the broken part. I have no idea what a snap ring failure would do to the driveability of the car.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2001 | 04:45 PM
  #15  
SCS2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
Default

Snap ring failure will cause the gear shifter to move back and forth or even pop in and out of gear during acceleration or deceleration. A new ring will provide a temporary fix but a manufacturing defect in the transmission case is the problem.
$1500 to $3000 repair depending on the honesty of your mechanic.

No new case = no fix.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2001 | 08:42 PM
  #16  
Elistan's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,323
Likes: 28
From: Longmont, CO
Default

Hmmm... Doesn't sound like the snap ring problem. I drove a '91 NSX with the snap ring issue - didnt' realize it at the time. But my Acura dealership strongly recommended I NOT by that car, because it'd cost about $10k to fix. It had the exact issues SCS2k mentioned.

That was a fun test-drive, though.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2001 | 08:47 AM
  #17  
S2K Fan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,898
Likes: 0
From: San Jose
Default

Didn't Jeff get a good price for a fairly newer model?
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2001 | 12:09 PM
  #18  
Juila911's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: West Lafayette
Default

I got another question. Are 91-94 NSXs slower than S2000 in 1/4 mile? I thought that NSX(91-94) could do 13.4 in 1/4mile. Am I wrong
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2001 | 01:28 PM
  #19  
F20C's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: York
Default

I'd like to get my hands on an NSX myself. Personally, I'd try to find a '97+. It will cost you more, but you can get the 6 speed, 3.2 liter 290hp engine, and the targa top, can't forget spa yellow pearl. You should be able to find a '91-'93 for around $30k depending on the condition.

I think I might just get an NSX to get some more legroom, I'm 6'3".
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2001 | 05:48 PM
  #20  
jws626's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: NW DC
Default

Originally posted by Juila911
I got another question. Are 91-94 NSXs slower than S2000 in 1/4 mile? I thought that NSX(91-94) could do 13.4 in 1/4mile. Am I wrong
Only cars subsequent to 97 will be able to do that stock. Pre- 97s are about as fast as the S2000 due to less HP and a five speed box with taller gearing. I've beaten one while driving an M3 but haven't gone against one in the S2000 yet.

Good looking car but pop-up headlights are making it dated.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:16 AM.