Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

Is A Huge LCD Good For Computer Games??? (please help)

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 18, 2002 | 10:29 PM
  #1  
xfactor834's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
From: L.A.
Default Is A Huge LCD Good For Computer Games??? (please help)

I was just wondering...I'm really looking into buying a kick-ass monitor for my computer.

I had an incredible monitor in the Sony GDM F500 (predecessor to the GDM F520), which was a 21" CRT with a perfectly flat screen and a .22mm dot pitch with razor sharp quality. That was incredible for games, spreadsheets, editing, etc.

Unfortunately, it burned out a year after I got it, and even though the warranty was over on it, Sony was unbelievably kind in refunding my entire purchase price on it (~$2,000).

Anyway, the new GDM F520 is out...which I am afraid to buy because of how my old monitor burned out (I've been reading that these monitors have this inherent flaw).

So I'm considering buying a high-quality LCD, such as the Apple Cinema Display 23" or the new Samsung 24". Agreed, both are very pricey at over $3,000...but I'm looking for the best.

Do you guys think that they'd be good for games? Clarity wouldn't be an issue, but how about refresh rates? Keep in mind that I own a PC, and even though I can connect the Apple to my PC, I've heard that compatibility may be an issue.

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2002 | 11:01 PM
  #2  
SECRET AP1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,133
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
Default

im using an 18" Sony flat panel that works very well. you can clearly tell that LCDs can perform as well as CRTs when it comes to games, but the difference isn't noticeable. i dont think ill go back to CRT though. i had a 15" Sony flat panel before this that i loved. not even a 1/2" thick.

either way you cant go wrong. [personally i'd stay away from samsung displays though.]

r.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 10:17 AM
  #3  
xfactor834's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
From: L.A.
Default

Why would you stay away from Samsung?
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 03:47 PM
  #4  
WestSideBilly's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 93,305
Likes: 820
From: Nowhere
Default

One thing to consider is the type of game you will be playing. For static games (strategy, RPGs, etc) LCDs are great. But if you're going to play fast games (FPS, simulations, etc) where you'll be pushing 90+ frames per second, a CRT is a better choice because the LCDs can't refresh fast enough (even if they can run at 70 Hz, it's probably not enough). However, I haven't gotten a chance to try the latest generation of LCDs, so some of them might be ok.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 05:15 PM
  #5  
Audball's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: Austin
Default

One thing to think about when going to that big an LCD is that many games might not support the native resolution (I'd imagine it would be 1600x1200 on a monitor that size). Playing games at anything other than the LCD's native resultion looks very ugly.

As an aside, I have a ViewSonic VA800 LCD (18"), and I'm perfectly happy with it for games (play RPGs, FPS - my new favorite being BF1942). While I can tell that it is slower than a CRT, it's still perfectly fine for me (It does use one of the more recent LCD technologies which allows for greater contrast and faster pixel transitions...). The color, clarity, lack of geometry errors, light weight, and space savings are all worth the lower performance, IMO.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Diego1107
Off-topic Talk
20
Jan 14, 2010 10:07 AM
dyhppy
Off-topic Talk
4
Jul 15, 2007 09:38 PM
funsdead
Off-topic Talk
11
Apr 12, 2002 07:11 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:43 PM.