Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

Human or Dog? 16 Babies? WTF?

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 10:50 AM
  #31  
exceltoexcel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,938
Likes: 0
From: limerick
Default

Originally Posted by JonBoy,Oct 20 2005, 02:04 PM
I'm going to save a screenshot of this, exceltoexcel. Now, whenever we disagree, I will point to this page and say "But you ONCE agreed with me".
It happens more than you think.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 11:02 AM
  #32  
wantone's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 29,845
Likes: 1
From: La La Land
Default

Originally Posted by S2020,Oct 20 2005, 11:38 AM
at first I thought this was a thread about that picture of the human-dog hybrid with babies nursing.
can't find the pic but some of you know what i'm talking about.
Ummmm no...
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 11:13 AM
  #33  
RossoS2K's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 0
From: Keene
Default

Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.
Basic idea this country was founded on.

More power to them.



I don't agree with them...but if they can handle their stuff....
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 11:20 AM
  #34  
TrojanHorse's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,772
Likes: 0
From: Signal Hill, SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by JonBoy,Oct 20 2005, 07:46 AM
Judging from his writing, he's gay, an only child, an atheist, and thinks that he's got everything going for him.
Other than the gay part I fit that criteria and I think he is a jerkoff and his article is terrible.

Don't be guilty of stereotyping atheist only children who think they have everything going for them the way he stereotyped Christians.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 11:27 AM
  #35  
SIIK2NR's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,796
Likes: 2
From: San Diego, Wess-Side!!
Default

"and you cannot help but wonder about her body and its various biological and sexual ... no, no, it is not for this space to visualize frighteningly capacious vaginal dimensions. It is not for this space to imagine this couple's soggy sexual mutations. We do not have enough wine on hand for that. "

Reply
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 11:35 AM
  #36  
no_really's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,319
Likes: 0
From: City
Default

Originally Posted by wantone,Oct 20 2005, 11:21 AM
I guess this is some pretty sensational news to us peeps in the Bay Area. To raise just one child in the Bay Area costs $$$! Imagine 16. Some more interesting thoughts from this thread...

https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=329051
it's called "parochialism." "The way we do things here is the way it should be everywhere. I simply cannot imagine that someone can have a life different than mine, and if they do, there must be something wrong with it."

Sometimes, it seems the self-defined "liberal-minded" can be the most closed-minded. Apparently it is OK to be gay, but not OK to procreate. It is OK to be atheist, but not OK to believe in God and go to church. It is OK to dress in leather chaps and parade through the street, but not OK to go to Great Clips for a haircut and shop at Walmart for clothing. Not liking the flaunting of homosexuality is a character flaw, but comparing a loving mother to a dog is OK, because said mother had kids. WTF? Liberal, my ass. Unless "California Liberal" just means "unsufferable knee-jerk conservative."
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 11:43 AM
  #37  
exceltoexcel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,938
Likes: 0
From: limerick
Default

Liberals are the new conservatives!
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 01:05 PM
  #38  
JonBoy's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 19,734
Likes: 247
Default

Originally Posted by TrojanHorse,Oct 20 2005, 02:20 PM
Other than the gay part I fit that criteria and I think he is a jerkoff and his article is terrible.

Don't be guilty of stereotyping atheist only children who think they have everything going for them the way he stereotyped Christians.
I see your at the end, but just to clarify, I was joking about that part. Well, as stated, I was sort of joking and more making the point that even such a broad statement isn't nearly as broad as the one(s) he made in that article.

I guess you're just an atypical only-child atheists.

That article is, plain and simple, trash. It's crude, it's illogical, it's fully of stereotypes, embellishments, and false information, and it's flat out misguided.

If he'd put that much effort into bashing people that have three cars (or two eight-passenger SUVs for a family of three), he'd get somewhere in life.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 03:07 PM
  #39  
happs22's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,361
Likes: 0
From: Long Island/C'ville, VA
Default

Holy crap, that guy got to have sex 16 times? Lucky bastard!
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 07:54 PM
  #40  
WestSideBilly's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 93,305
Likes: 820
From: Nowhere
Default

Originally Posted by JerseyGirl,Oct 20 2005, 09:26 AM
Could be quite scary if all of them grew up w/ the mentality that a woman's goal in life should be to pop out as many kids as she can.
Come visit me some time Kimmy. That's a very common mentality in these parts. Many women define their life as a success/failure based on having kids.


I personally don't agree with it, but if they can raise their kids well (big if), more power to them.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:07 PM.