less attractive women
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 11,119
Likes: 47
From: Wildwood, TN.
Originally Posted by my2ks2k,Apr 28 2008, 09:00 AM
i disagree that short hair necessarily ruins women:
even
doesn't hurt that she's f...ing beautiful though
even
doesn't hurt that she's f...ing beautiful though
Women with hair that short are either going through cancer treatment (legitimate excuse I might add) or living a lifestyle in which the last thing on their mind is a man!
Former Moderator
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 59,195
Likes: 1
From: Ventura, California, USA
Originally Posted by INTJ,Apr 28 2008, 10:06 AM
Tim hit the nail on the head, Rusty is on track with the front end IMO.
OF COURSE its a gradient. Look what happens with the addition of alcohol or ex to the equation.
Is there a lower limit? Sure, but men screw cadavers and farm animals, so it it probably not definable.
Attractiveness *and* personality is the winning combination. Too many hotties with brains of mush and shite for personality.
OF COURSE its a gradient. Look what happens with the addition of alcohol or ex to the equation.
Is there a lower limit? Sure, but men screw cadavers and farm animals, so it it probably not definable.
Attractiveness *and* personality is the winning combination. Too many hotties with brains of mush and shite for personality.
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,057
Likes: 0
From: nc
we're talking about looks, not the reason behind the looks. in natalie's case, it was for a movie, which doesn't fit into either of the reasons you provided.
and no, i'm not kidding. i think she's still hot with little or no hair. as far as i'm concerned, this is how you determine if a girl is truly. for example, britney spears...trashy, but pretty hot, right? or is she...
and no, i'm not kidding. i think she's still hot with little or no hair. as far as i'm concerned, this is how you determine if a girl is truly. for example, britney spears...trashy, but pretty hot, right? or is she...
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,778
Likes: 0
From: Kona, HI
Originally Posted by my2ks2k,Apr 28 2008, 12:10 PM
we're talking about looks, not the reason behind the looks. in natalie's case, it was for a movie, which doesn't fit into either of the reasons you provided.
and no, i'm not kidding. i think she's still hot with little or no hair. as far as i'm concerned, this is how you determine if a girl is truly. for example, britney spears...trashy, but pretty hot, right? or is she...
and no, i'm not kidding. i think she's still hot with little or no hair. as far as i'm concerned, this is how you determine if a girl is truly. for example, britney spears...trashy, but pretty hot, right? or is she...
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,057
Likes: 0
From: nc
Originally Posted by J3ffro,Apr 28 2008, 12:04 PM
I would tag Natalie with that hair all day long. Sure longer is better. Britney on the other hand, especially Britney in this picture, sad to say...not a chance. I'd probably go all whiskey dick...even completely sober.
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,632
Likes: 0
From: Fresno, CA
LOL britneys got an ugly ass head.
If a girls not all that pretty, I'll still hit it if she has a nice ass or rack but for her to be girlfriend material she's got to have the total package and no I wont settle for less unless she's rich.
If a girls not all that pretty, I'll still hit it if she has a nice ass or rack but for her to be girlfriend material she's got to have the total package and no I wont settle for less unless she's rich.
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
From: Newport Beach
You date and marry within your station in life. Avg Joe ends up with Avg Jane. Flaw in this plan big willy gets you a better girl. Deep pockets gets you prime talent, wage slave well good luck to you. Girl with natural big rack if she is fixable with a little nip and cut can move up the wage slave guy.
