Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

M Roadster test drive.

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 28, 2001 | 02:33 PM
  #1  
DavidY's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: SF
Default M Roadster test drive.

Hi Guys -
Just got back from test driving the new BMS M Roadster, the car has amazing low end torque and seems to rev alot easier. All in all, I like the new M Roadster more than the S2000.
I wish Honda would consider offering a 6 cylinder engine in the S2000! More low end, street cruising torque would be nice!

-Dave
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2001 | 02:54 PM
  #2  
BB AP1's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: Toronto/Hong Kong
Default

Is it the 315hp version or 240hp version that u drove?
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2001 | 03:13 PM
  #3  
Takashi KazuMori's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,993
Likes: 0
From: Unknown
Default

I think it's the 315hp version one since he mentioned M and we all know what M is all about. The 4 output exhaust is the most visible note from the normal versions.

Reply
Old Jul 28, 2001 | 03:19 PM
  #4  
12gage's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: Spring,Tx
Default

The M roadster is definitely a great car. It seems like you may have found that fits your needs a little better. The S2000 hasn't been designed for low end torque or street cruising so I doubt that a 6 cylinder with more torque would help unless honda decides to reengineer the car and take it in a different direction.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2001 | 03:55 PM
  #5  
DJRobNM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
From: Royal Oak
Default

All I want is another .5 liter displacment! Technically, that would give us three hundred HP and would make my grin even wider. I don't think a V6 would be the way to go due to its added weight. Oh, and iVtec wouldn't be bad either.

Reply
Old Jul 28, 2001 | 05:30 PM
  #6  
Speedy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: Denver
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by DavidY
[B]Hi Guys -
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2001 | 05:43 PM
  #7  
pfb's Avatar
pfb
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,504
Likes: 0
From: Boulder
Default

Originally posted by Takashi KazuMori
think it's the 315hp version one since he mentioned M and we all know what M is all about. [/COLOR]
In the U.S. (possibly worldwide), pre 2002 M-Roadsters and M-coupes had 240 HP. The new 2002 has the same motor as the new M3, making slightly less dyno horsepower due to space-constrained intake and exhaust limiations, at 315 HP. Both are M's.

2002 M-roadsters are still pretty rare. I don't think dealers have taken delivery of more than 1 or 2. My local dealer hasn't even recieved their first yet...
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jul 28, 2001 | 08:02 PM
  #8  
Jay Li's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,670
Likes: 0
From: Santa Monica, CA
Default

Moving to OT.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2001 | 08:10 PM
  #9  
QueRAM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: TROY
Default

Originally posted by pfb


In the U.S. (possibly worldwide), pre 2002 M-Roadsters and M-coupes had 240 HP. The new 2002 has the same motor as the new M3, making slightly less dyno horsepower due to space-constrained intake and exhaust limiations, at 315 HP. Both are M's.

2002 M-roadsters are still pretty rare. I don't think dealers have taken delivery of more than 1 or 2. My local dealer hasn't even recieved their first yet...
2001s have the 315hp engine.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2001 | 08:17 PM
  #10  
Driver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: Gladys
Default

Put a super charger on the S2k and blow the M away !!

Not to mention for about 30K less !!
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:27 AM.