Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

Matsushita to sell record 103-inch plasma TVs

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 10, 2006 | 07:51 PM
  #1  
WarrenW's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,766
Likes: 8
From: Queens, NY
Default Matsushita to sell record 103-inch plasma TVs

From Yahoo:
TOKYO (Reuters) - Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. Ltd., the maker of Panasonic brand electronics, said on Monday it hoped to start selling the world's largest plasma television by early next year.

Measuring 2.4 metres by 1.4 meters and weighing 215 kg, the 103-inch panel is bigger than a double-sized mattress and almost as heavy as an upright piano.

The world's largest consumer electronics maker has yet to set the price but Matsushita's 65-inch plasma TVs, its largest available now, sell for about $7,500 in Japan.

The plasma panel used in the Matsushita TV will be just one-inch larger measured diagonally than a 102-inch model developed by Samsung SDI Co. Ltd. The South Korean company has not launched the model commercially.

Matsushita is the world's largest plasma TV maker competing with smaller rivals such as South Korea's LG Electronics Inc.

As liquid crystal display (LCD) TVs encroach on the market for 40-inch TVs and above -- which had previously seen as plasma TV's turf -- developing even larger-sized panels is important for plasma TV makers to remain competitive.

Sharp Corp. plans to bring on stream the world's first plant that cuts LCD panels from eighth-generation glass in October.

Eighth-generation glass is bigger than seventh-generation glass now used by Sony Corp. and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. in their joint venture, and allows LCD makers to produce large-sized panels economically.

Matsushita also said it had started taking orders for the 103-inch panels in the United States for business use, such as studio monitors at broadcasting companies and electronic billboards, and planned to deliver them from this autumn.

Matsushita aims to sell 5,000 units of the 103-inch panels a year, with TV demand accounting for little less than 20 percent, which can be calculated into annual sales of some 1,000 103-inch TVs.

The new panels will meet full high-definition specifications, meaning they can produce images at the highest standard of 1,920 by 1,080 pixels of resolution.

Osaka-based Matsushita controlled 21.6 percent of the global plasma TV market in the January-March quarter, followed by LG Electronics with 17.8 percent, according to DisplaySearch.

Shares of Matsushita closed up 1.5 percent at 2,390 yen, outstripping the Tokyo stock market's electrical machinery index, which gained 1.2 percent.
-------------------------------------------------------

Warren
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2006 | 08:39 PM
  #2  
flitcroft's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,802
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Default

C'mon now. Pics are required for this kind of post



Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 03:50 AM
  #3  
DiamondDave2005's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,897
Likes: 1
From: Cherry Hill, NJ
Default

At that price point, I'd rather have a projector. This thing will be obsolete so fast I could never spend that kind of money on it. I paid $3k for a 50" DLP a few years ago, and I'm sure I'd be lucky to get $500 for it now.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 05:39 AM
  #4  
Wildncrazy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,771
Likes: 2
Default

But projectors don't do as well at normal room lighting.

Irregardless, my new media room won't have windows and WILL have a very large projection screen.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 02:26 PM
  #5  
C U AT 9K's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 17,163
Likes: 4
Default

My dad has a home theater in his basement with a 110" movie screen and a projecter from the ceiling. It's pretty cool, but the quality is not even close to that of a plasma. This thing must be spectacular in person. My only problem with plasmas is that, its a HDTV, and pretty much every channel that doesnt come in HD, pretty much sucks.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 02:52 PM
  #6  
i_heart_my_DB8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 8,586
Likes: 0
From: Scatterbrainia
Default

Originally Posted by flitcroft,Jul 10 2006, 09:39 PM
C'mon now. Pics are required for this kind of post
Aw man... it actually looks SMALLER than I thought it would in those photos
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2006 | 07:51 AM
  #7  
flitcroft's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,802
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Default

^ About 5.5-6ft wide, right? The measurement is on the diagnoal so getting an 11' wide TV is a ways off. And getting a house in LA with an 11ft' wall is 1.5m anyway
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jul 12, 2006 | 09:02 AM
  #8  
gosixers215's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,429
Likes: 1
Default

Ballers only I would be interested to see if they did a comparison next to a 20 inch plasma screen, just for scaling purposes.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2006 | 09:22 AM
  #9  
seventurn's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 91
Likes: 1
Default

yea for that huge screen, im pretty sure itd be stupid expensive..

we've had pretty good quality watching with a ceiling mounted projector. HALO with the projector is great..
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2006 | 08:23 PM
  #10  
jah's Avatar
jah
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,490
Likes: 0
From: denver
Default

from what i hear the new plasma screen is not recomended for ceiling mount as it weights several hundred pounds.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:26 AM.