View Poll Results: Be found guilty or innocent?

Found Guilty

43.75%

Found Innocent

56.25%

Voters: 32. You may not vote on this poll

Michael Jackson - Guilty or Innocent

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Jun 13, 2005 | 01:40 PM

#21

F1s2000

Registered User

Joined: May 2002

Posts: 2,228

Likes: 0

From: Miami

Quote:

Originally Posted by honda606,Jun 13 2005, 04:25 PM

This trial confirms that if your net worth is in the nine figures or more that America's court system won't touch you.

No. This just means that when you present a case against some one make shore you have your shit together. I think the prosecution did a HORRIBLE job. Sloppy work. And not very credible evidence.

Jun 13, 2005 | 01:45 PM

#22

RWD_HNDA

Registered User

Joined: Feb 2005

Posts: 4,633

Likes: 0

From: homeless!!

It's hard to come up with credible evedence when its based on lies...I mean look at the democratic party

Jun 13, 2005 | 01:56 PM

#23

mav

Registered User

Joined: May 2001

Posts: 7,337

Likes: 3

From: Los Angeles, Miami

What is the answer to 99 out of 100 questions? Money. Money buys freedom, like OJ and now like Michael Jackson.

Jun 13, 2005 | 02:02 PM

#24

RWD_HNDA

Registered User

Joined: Feb 2005

Posts: 4,633

Likes: 0

From: homeless!!

[QUOTE=mav,Jun 13 2005, 01:56 PM] What is the answer to 99 out of 100 questions?

Jun 13, 2005 | 02:18 PM

#25

Fletch

Joined: Jul 2002

Posts: 17,572

Likes: 1

From: Wakefield, West Yorks.

The only possible verdict they could come to.

I'm not a big fan or anything but from the footage I saw the prosecution completely failed to prove anything, and the accusers were shown, quite convincingly, to be untrustworthy.

I'd have been shocked if it went against him.

Whether he did actually do it or not, I don't know. I wasn't there and therefore not qualified to comment.

Jun 13, 2005 | 02:33 PM

#26

eSeM

Joined: Dec 2001

Posts: 39,548

Likes: 11

From: City Of London / Knebworth

Quote:

Originally Posted by RWD_HNDA,Jun 13 2005, 10:02 PM

That's funny, you say he only got off because he has money. I say he was only accused cause he has money.

Remind me, how much was it that he paid Jordan Chandler *not* to go to court

Jun 13, 2005 | 02:35 PM

#27

Fletch

Joined: Jul 2002

Posts: 17,572

Likes: 1

From: Wakefield, West Yorks.

Exactly why he was accused again. (well possibly)

The dumb ar$e should have known they'd all come out of the woodwork.

Jun 13, 2005 | 02:39 PM

#28

RWD_HNDA

Registered User

Joined: Feb 2005

Posts: 4,633

Likes: 0

From: homeless!!

He paid him $20mil in hopes of saving his career, cause at that time he still somewhat had one, and a long drawn out court battle would do nothing but hurt him.

Jun 13, 2005 | 03:26 PM

#29

BPUKiller

Registered User

Joined: Jul 2002

Posts: 2,280

Likes: 0

From: San Diego

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gymkata,Jun 13 2005, 01:28 PM

Nah, this just means people are fed up with cheap-shots trying to get $$$ of Jacko...hopefully he learned his lesson and never invite those pesky lil kids to his ranch again.

No, he likes his cucumbers pickled