There are some "facts" that, to my knowledge, MJ has not denied (ex. allowing children to sleep in his bed, etc.) that are all red flags. Of course given the media it is difficult to know the whole "truth" but based on the things he himself has admittedly done, you can't help but at least have strong suspicions.

To call people ignorant and stupid because they make judgements without knowing MJ personally is a bit hypocritcal when you're doing the same thing, no?

 

agreed. A better example is the O.J case though. The case that was brought against MJ really wasnt that great. From the evidence I was able to see, I couldnt have convicted him, even I am fairly certain he is guity. There is a decent amount of doubt and thats what the law says. The OJ case was a joke....the blood, cuts on his hands, the defense playing the race card. That trial was ridiculous and to think they sentenced scott peterson to death based on circumstancial evidence. Peterson was convicted because he was ing Amber Frey while his wife was missing. Regardless of his guilt or innocence, his quest for new pssy is what convicted him. A cheating man instantly biases the female jurors...

 

This is a bad example, buddy. That loser is SOO guilty it's not even funny.

 

Jackson will be back for the 3rd try.

On CNN, a juror was asked:

1) Are u confidant of your decision? ... "yes"

2) Would u let your child stay there? ... "Not over night, I am a portective parent"!

 

"Red flags"? Red flags for whom? Red flags from what? Child molesters in the past? Michael in the past? The fact that a child sleeps in a mans bed does NOT prove anything sexual happened, therefore the fact that you call it a "red flag" just goes to show that you're another sheep, conditioned by the media to believe that all things you don't understand or that won't fit into this CURRENT society are inherently wrong.

"Strong suspicions"? Based on what? The media? Don't get me started. Never forget that hype and sensationalism are their forte.

No, I'm not doing the same, I'm simply stating the fact that I DON'T KNOW, so I reserve judgement, and anyone doing any different without privy knowledge is an IDIOT. This point is non-negotiable.

 

1. You're not my buddy.
2. Were you there? If not, shut your pie-hole, 'cause all you write is the dog food you've been fed.

 

My profession and educational background give me more knowledge about the dynamics of sexual abuse than some others have. I'm not saying that red flags "prove" anything, but they are most certainly indications that something should be looked into further.
To call me a "sheep, conditioned by the media" is outright inaccurate. If you knew me you would know I inherently mistrust ALL media and highly value critical thinking. On the contrary, I understand sexual abuse very well. It's my job.

Since you've passed judgement on me without "privy knowledge" does that make you an idiot too?

 

[QUOTE=S2Kguy,Jun 14 2005, 10:30 AM] 1. You're not my buddy.
2. Were you there?

 

Shareall: Your education and background have failed you, I made a reasonable assumption about you based on what you wrote with regards to red flags. Not all people are the same, and on that note, I'll remind you who you're talking about in this instance. To compare anyone in the world to Michael is pure folly.

gotrice02: To "figure that one out" takes more than you might think, and neither you or I are in a position to know anything about it for certain, so if we choose to make up our minds based on what the media has fed us, that makes us stupid.

As I said before, the only reasonable choice is to reserve judgement because the absolute truth of the matter cannot be known. Have you forgotten that of the 3 people on earth that truly knew if O.J. did it or not, 2 are dead? For you to suppose that it's simple to say O.J. murdered those people is a testament to your ignorance, and nothing more.

 

OJ is quilty. Wacko Jacko is quilty.

Question to Jacko's supporters - Would you let your own son sleep in the same bed as MJ unsupervised? I think not...