Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

Microsoft blew it again

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 14, 2005 | 05:17 PM
  #21  
exceltoexcel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,938
Likes: 0
From: limerick
Default

Firefox can be compromised just like IE, if not more so. The only reason it is more secure is because no one is using it as much as IE. As its market share grows so will the holes and once its big enough you'll be bitching about it just like IE. Fact is IE has far more functionality. If you have a clue you can protect yourself from active X controls every time. New security (if you bother to download it and update your software) blocks all active x controls unless you give them permission. Basically IE is far superiour to firefox, if your educated. IE is a powerfull tool that can act like fine grit sandpaper or tear through metal like the jaws of death. You have to have enough knowledge to use it properly. Unfortunatly, most users are morons, for them firefox is a reasonable solution. Microsoft mediocrity is what drives the technology market. Lets see, office, windows, server software, .net mappoint etc etc... I havn't found one OS, crapx included, that beats windows. Not one office (open office coral suite) that comes close to the ease of use and functionality. Hate microsoft all you want but if you need to get the job done efficently its all that is worth using. Graphics, video go to apple. Otherwise you're dealing with half baked products that just don't cut it.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2005 | 05:22 PM
  #22  
jasonw's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 16,702
Likes: 0
From: █ SF, CA █
Default

Originally Posted by exceltoexcel,Nov 14 2005, 06:17 PM
Hate microsoft all you want but if you need to get the job done efficently its all that worth using.
For a little perspective count the systems running M$ software in the World's fastest 500 computers Granted, these are not for destkop productivity but, it shows that there are lots of more capable software firms. M$ did not gain the market share it has on quality alone(or even mostly)...
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2005 | 05:25 PM
  #23  
jasonw's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 16,702
Likes: 0
From: █ SF, CA █
Default

Originally Posted by exceltoexcel,Nov 14 2005, 06:17 PM
Firefox can be compromised just like IE, if not more so.
People can do their own research on this. Firefox is more open about it's vulnerabilities and fixes them faster. M$ tries to cover them up. This is a classic example of open source vs. proprietary. If you believe in security through obscurity, go with M$... If you believe in better code review, go with open source...
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2005 | 07:37 PM
  #24  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

[QUOTE=exceltoexcel,Nov 14 2005, 09:17 PM] Firefox can be compromised just like IE, if not more so. The only reason it is more secure is because no one is using it as much as IE.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2005 | 09:59 PM
  #25  
Purple_sky's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,899
Likes: 0
From: Purple sky
Default

Why is a blowjob called a blowjob again?
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2005 | 02:43 AM
  #26  
exceltoexcel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,938
Likes: 0
From: limerick
Default

Originally Posted by Saki GT,Nov 14 2005, 11:37 PM
Software shouldn't be designed so you need "a clue" to use it safely. That's like giving a kid a loaded gun and blaming it when it shoots someone because it should have had "a clue". IE is decrepit, does not conform to international standards, and has almost none of the features found in modern browsers.
Oh I thought we were all adults here. Let me change this statement That's like giving an adult a loaded gun and blaming the adult when they shoot someone because they should have a clue.


What features are you talking about. Considering the enhancements made recently like tabs and god knows all the po-up blocking add ins you can get.

If you're educated IE isn't a big hole.

How many people out there never downloaded a patch in their life. Are still running windows 98? Don't use a router, a firewall, or virus protection? Oh look if I point this loaded gun to my head and pull this trigger.... Guess what, windows has a free built in firewall, you can get free spyware protection, and if you change your settings in IE you can block nearly everything. Guess the reason why its not so good is, well, kids with loaded guns.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2005 | 05:37 AM
  #27  
jasonw's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 16,702
Likes: 0
From: █ SF, CA █
Default

Originally Posted by exceltoexcel,Nov 15 2005, 03:43 AM
you can get free spyware protection
Have you ever considered that you shouldn't need spyware protection?
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2005 | 06:20 AM
  #28  
importluva's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 302
Likes: 5
From: Jax
Default

I've tried firefox. Then i tried Opera. Opera > Firefox. Overall i've found Safari works best for me.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2005 | 08:37 AM
  #29  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

Oh I thought we were all adults here. Let me change this statement That's like giving an adult a loaded gun and blaming the adult when they shoot someone because they should have a clue.
Kids or uneducated adults, the moral of the story is that you shouldn't give out loaded guns and expect things not to blow up.

Guess what, windows has a free built in firewall, you can get free spyware protection, and if you change your settings in IE you can block nearly everything
Windows XP SP2 has a built in firewall, and you're right, there is a woefully low portion of the public with the latest Windows OS and all the requisite updates.

Thats not relevant here though - the point is with IE you can still simply go to a web page that is fully allowed by all your security and firewalls, and still get infected. Active X is just bad, and you shouldn't have to flip a whole bunch of settings to make your computer safe when it could come from the factory that way if the basic programming was decent.

Firefox is free, it works better, or at least just as well as IE, and it offers a lot of functionailty IE doesn't. Here's the extension page:

https://addons.mozilla.org/extension...cation=firefox


And some of my favorite extensions:

http://www.bugmenot.com/
http://flashblock.mozdev.org/
https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/morei...ication=firefox
https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/morei...umpg=10&id=1269
https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/morei...numpg=10&id=636
https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/morei...umpg=10&id=1368

But there are tons more.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2005 | 08:54 AM
  #30  
JonBoy's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 19,734
Likes: 247
Default

Originally Posted by Saki GT,Nov 15 2005, 12:37 PM
Windows XP SP2 has a built in firewall, and you're right, there is a woefully low portion of the public with the latest Windows OS and all the requisite updates.

Thats not relevant here though - the point is with IE you can still simply go to a web page that is fully allowed by all your security and firewalls, and still get infected. Active X is just bad, and you shouldn't have to flip a whole bunch of settings to make your computer safe when it could come from the factory that way if the basic programming was decent.

Firefox is free, it works better, or at least just as well as IE, and it offers a lot of functionailty IE doesn't.
Sounds to me like you're saying that Firefox has DEFAULT settings that are more protective. It's not the IE can't do the same (and more), just that the default setup in IE isn't quite as aggressive in protecting the machine.

exceltoexcel has pointed out that you can literally make your machine incapable of using the internet by tailoring your protections in IE. If the capability is there, I don't see that you have a foot to stand on, except perhaps that you have to set up those things yourself to get similar protection to what Firefox offers out of the box.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:57 PM.