Moto V3
The RAZR V3 pretty much uses the same software as the one in the V600. Overall, the V3 is better than the V600, the only downsides being the width (maybe less comfortable to hold and talk for some), the polarized screen (but you get used to it), the dull outer screen, and of course, the price. My only guess as to why they polarized the screen side to side is to achieve a 3D-ish holographic look. The V3 is much less of a value than the V600. However, the V3 has better RF performance, larger screen with more colors, color outer screen, the speakerphone can be turned on before the connect but not before the dial, and the slim profile.
Btw, did anyone see Jennifer Garner use the RAZR on "Alias"?
Btw, did anyone see Jennifer Garner use the RAZR on "Alias"?
Originally Posted by speed4tu,Jan 23 2005, 11:26 PM
Personally I think it is overpriced right now, I have the v551 and it works great. Had the MPx 220 but it was a total piece of shit.
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by SSS 01,Jan 24 2005, 01:15 AM
It's a vanity lifestyle phone, period. Want a top performer loaded with serious toys, try a smart phone, PDA phone or communicator instead.
Yep, that's what I mean. I don't need my phone to have a Windows OS and do 10 million things which I'll never use. The V3's feature set is bare-bones but has the necessary features to function as a phone (quad band for worldwide use, bluetooth, excellent RF, good battery life, and large screen) and is very light and slim. It's not flimsy at all either, the all-metal construction contributes to high torsional regidity despite its slimness. The phone doesn't skimp nor sacrifice on the important things. But I won't argue about the phone not being a good value. Like I said, I would never have paid full price for the V3.






