Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

My company is getting sued. Wtf.

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 11:52 AM
  #11  
Nin009's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,637
Likes: 0
From: Denver
Default

At-will in Colorado means you can terminate any employee at any time. You simply don't provide a reason. The minute you explain the termination, you open yourself up to wrongful dismissal.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 11:56 AM
  #12  
thebig33tuna's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 32,283
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Default

[QUOTE=Nin009,Jun 29 2010, 02:52 PM] At-will in Colorado means you can terminate any employee at any time.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 12:07 PM
  #13  
Incubus's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 5,729
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by thebig33tuna,Jun 29 2010, 07:56 PM
I get that - but if you terminate an employee and they then claim it's because they are

-female (or male i guess but who would be dumb enough to try that..)
-religion y
-race x

...those are still protected, and if the employee has evidence to support it (even really crappy evidence)... the company will have to defend itself in court or settle. The company can't just say 'nope, at will bichez! We don't have to say why we terminated employee x.'
You just can't terminate someone for the WRONG reason. Not providing a reason is a great way to avoid that.

Examples of an okay reason are:

Being ugly
Suing the company
Smelly

You should be fine firing someone for suing you, unless they also file a complaint with the EEOC or Dept. of Labor, etc. In most cases these entities will provide protection for the employees filing a complaint.

Disclaimer: I'm NOT a lawyer.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 12:22 PM
  #14  
bcs's Avatar
bcs
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 0
From: Renton, WA
Default

My mom was fired from one of her jobs because when the company was electing a new president (Grocery workers Union), the current president was going for re-election, as well as her friend (whom she had known for 20 years). She decided to stay neutral and not vote, as she didn't want to choose between her friend and her current boss.

The current president was re-elected, and the next day my mom was fired for not supporting her.

Sounded like a wrongful termination to us. But no lawyers would take the case because no one wanted to go up against a union.


It all depends on what is written in the company policy. If it states that they can terminate your employment for no reason (it could be because today is Tuesday), and the employee agrees to that...see ya.

At my current place, it is stated that way. They can terminate my employment for any reason. I just try to not give them a reason to fire me...like starting frivolous lawsuits.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 12:32 PM
  #15  
Kremlin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,478
Likes: 0
Default

Company owned locker = no expectation of privacy.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 12:32 PM
  #16  
PanteraKitty's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,056
Likes: 1
From: Stockbridge, Georgia
Default


Every place that I worked supplied the lockers and they were considered company property because the company bought them for us. I still have a couple of padlocks that were cut off and welded back together.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 12:35 PM
  #17  
S2020's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 112,963
Likes: 150
From: Doh!!
Default

I think they are right to be upset.
Searching through employee's private things speak volumes about trust.
I don't think they should have sued but I can see why they're upset.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 01:07 PM
  #18  
JonBoy's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 19,734
Likes: 247
Default

When something is stolen, someone has broken that trust. It warrants a search, in my opinion. If it's company-wide, not just specific people, it's relatively anonymous and not targeted so it shouldn't be personal to the employees.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 01:11 PM
  #19  
zzziippyyy's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 78,840
Likes: 7
From: On yo puter screen
Default

Originally Posted by Kremlin,Jun 29 2010, 03:32 PM
Company owned locker = no expectation of privacy.
This! = true
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 01:12 PM
  #20  
espelirS2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 17,670
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default

I'm of the believer if you have nothing to hide.. who cares?


I'm just sayin' maybe there was other things in there that they didn't want the boss man seeing.....
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:51 AM.