Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

Plane on conveyer: Will it ever take off?

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 05:55 PM
  #111  
magician's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,592
Likes: 0
From: Yorba Linda, CA
Default

Originally Posted by r_duff,Dec 6 2005, 06:27 PM
Third, I figured it out about 3 pages ago. thanks for the super late explaination.
Not everyone has.

You're welcome.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 06:38 PM
  #112  
mistressmotorsports's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

[QUOTE=03_AP1,Dec 6 2005, 05:28 PM]
Here's my shot in the dark, but I think the balloon will too, because in a moving car, the air inside the car is also moving at 45mph - assuming the car is sealed.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 06:48 PM
  #113  
03_AP1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,951
Likes: 0
From: Pembroke
Default

so what does the bouyency have to do with it?

If I had a tennis ball in my hand, and tossed it straight up just as I hit the wall, it would momentarily be bouyant would it not? And it would shoot forward on impact.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 06:51 PM
  #114  
VoIPA's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,557
Likes: 0
From: Huntsville
Default

The plane will NOT take off. There are two scenarios that prove this.

Scenario one: Design and construction of the enormous conveyor are awarded to the low bidder on a fixed price basis. This leads to the contractor cutting corners and catastrophic failure of the belt mechanism during testing destroys the aircraft before takeoff. Plane never leaves the ground (unless, of course, it is accidentally catapulted onto the nearby highway using the slingshot effect, but this is explained more by conservation of stupidity than actual "lift").

Scenario two: Design and construction of the conveyor are awarded to the low bidder on a cost-plus basis. Price overruns and an unfortunate change in government administration cause the project to be cancelled before the belt material is selected. Again, the plane stays planted to the Earth.

There is a third scenario which involves Haliburton, but I'll leave that for the politics forum.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 07:05 PM
  #115  
mistressmotorsports's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by 03_AP1,Dec 6 2005, 07:48 PM
so what does the bouyency have to do with it?

If I had a tennis ball in my hand, and tossed it straight up just as I hit the wall, it would momentarily be bouyant would it not? And it would shoot forward on impact.
A tennis ball is more dense than air, therefore it is not buoyant in air. It may be momentarily hanging in the air, but it is not buoyant. A helium balloon is buoyant in air, so it is going to act differently. Hint number 2: Ignore gravity, think density.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 07:35 PM
  #116  
FO2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
From: Fair Oaks
Default

Originally Posted by mistressmotorsports,Dec 6 2005, 09:57 AM
What happens to the VCR is obvious. But, what happens to the helium balloon?
I performed this experiment for my children when they were young and later with my grandchildren.

Instead of a VCR, I use a couple of balloons filled with air, and a couple with helium. I never get tired of seeing the results.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 07:48 PM
  #117  
VoIPA's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,557
Likes: 0
From: Huntsville
Default

Ok, here's my semi-educated guess: the VCR will obviously move forward, perhaps crushing your skull in the process, but the helium-filled balloon will actually move towards the rear of the car (in the car's frame of reference). As the car decelerates, air pressure at the front of the car increases. Helium weighs less than air, being less dense, and the increased pressure at the front of the vehicle will actually push the less dense balloon backwards. The same effect can be observed when driving with Britney Spears.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 07:58 PM
  #118  
Tedow's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,751
Likes: 1
From: Arlington, VA
Default

Originally Posted by VoIPA,Dec 6 2005, 10:48 PM
Ok, here's my semi-educated guess: An air-filled balloon will move forward, but the helium-filled balloon will actually move towards the rear of the car (in the car's frame of reference). Close?
I'm gonna join VoIPA on the limb on this one. The buoyancy (and drag?) of the balloon trying to move through the air will make it decelerate faster than the air that surrounds it, so the balloon moves backwards in the car.

at your previous post, btw, V .
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 08:01 PM
  #119  
VoIPA's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,557
Likes: 0
From: Huntsville
Default

Sorry, T. I was editing my post as you were typing yours. I decided to expand on my reasoning a bit...
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 08:38 PM
  #120  
VoIPA's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,557
Likes: 0
From: Huntsville
Default

Originally Posted by Tedow,Dec 6 2005, 10:58 PM
at your previous post, btw, V .
Can you tell I'm a former Civil Servant?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:57 PM.