Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

Post a random fact

Thread Tools
 
Old May 16, 2008 | 09:33 AM
  #121  
vader1's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,949
Likes: 472
From: MAHT-O-MEDI
Default

Originally Posted by PrimoGen,May 16 2008, 07:37 AM
Red Dawn was the first movie rated PG-13
And Midnight Cowboy was the only rated X movie to ever win best picture oscar.
Reply
Old May 16, 2008 | 09:53 AM
  #122  
magician's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,592
Likes: 0
From: Yorba Linda, CA
Default

[QUOTE=Gymkata,May 16 2008, 09:14 AM]1936 . . . Baby Ruth
Reply
Old May 16, 2008 | 10:32 AM
  #123  
PrimoGen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 16,759
Likes: 1
From: Sun★Works
Default

Originally Posted by magician,May 16 2008, 11:32 AM
I'm pretty sure this isn't true.
is it that hard to believe?


Without getting into a big mathmatical disscussion. How many thousands or millions of people do you think inhabited the planet say even.... 2000 years ago?

Go back farther ...go all the way back to the ICE age or whenever you think the "dawn" of man would have been.

the human population on this planet only realy started blossom quickly in the past 2000 years or so...

[QUOTE]by Carl Haub

"How Many People Have Ever Lived on Earth?" is the most requested Population Today article. It first appeared in February 1995.

(Population Today, November/December 2002) The question of how many people have ever lived on Earth is a perennial one among information calls to PRB. One reason the question keeps coming up is that somewhere, at some time back in the 1970s, a now-forgotten writer made the statement that 75 percent of the people who had ever been born were alive at that moment.

This factoid has had a long shelf life, even though a bit of reflection would show how unlikely it is. For this "estimate" to be true would mean either that births in the 20th century far, far outnumbered those in the past or that there were an extraordinary number of extremely old people living in the 1970s.

If this estimate were true, it would indeed make an impressive case for the rapid pace of population growth in this century. But if we judge the idea that three-fourths of people who ever lived are alive today to be a ridiculous statement, have demographers come up with a better estimate? What might be a reasonable estimate of the actual percentage?

Any such exercise can be only a highly speculative enterprise, to be undertaken with far less seriousness than most demographic inquiries. Nonetheless, it is a somewhat intriguing idea that can be approached on at least a semi-scientific basis.

And semi-scientific it must be, because there are, of course, absolutely no demographic data available for 99 percent of the span of the human stay on Earth. Still, with some speculation concerning prehistoric populations, we can at least approach a guesstimate of this elusive number.

Prehistory and History
Any estimate of the total number of people who have ever been born will depend basically on two factors: (1) the length of time humans are thought to have been on Earth and (2) the average size of the human population at different periods.

Fixing a time when the human race actually came into existence is not a straightforward matter. Various ancestors of Homo sapiens seem to have appeared at least as early as 700,000 B.C. Hominids walked the Earth as early as several million years ago. According to the United Nations' Determinants and Consequences of Population Trends, modern Homo sapiens may have appeared about 50,000 B.C. This long period of 50,000 years holds the key to the question of how many people have ever been born.

At the dawn of agriculture, about 8000 B.C., the population of the world was somewhere on the order of 5 million. (Very rough figures are given in the table; these are averages of an estimate of ranges given by the United Nations and other sources.) The slow growth of population over the 8,000-year period, from an estimated 5 million to 300 million in 1 A.D., results in a very low growth rate
Reply
Old May 16, 2008 | 10:37 AM
  #124  
magician's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,592
Likes: 0
From: Yorba Linda, CA
Default

Originally Posted by PrimoGen,May 16 2008, 10:32 AM
is it that hard to believe?
Yes.
Reply
Old May 16, 2008 | 10:45 AM
  #125  
PrimoGen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 16,759
Likes: 1
From: Sun★Works
Default

well then, I digress
Reply
Old May 16, 2008 | 11:35 AM
  #126  
airgate's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 25,439
Likes: 2
From: St. Louis, MO
Default

Also, math is hard.
Reply
Old May 16, 2008 | 11:51 AM
  #127  
Gymkata's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,720
Likes: 0
Default

Speaking of population, here's lil somepin' bout Mexican population back in 2003:


Mexico
Reply
Old May 16, 2008 | 11:51 AM
  #128  
ace123's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 3
Default

x^2 + y^2 = r^2 is the generic formula for a circle.
Reply
Old May 16, 2008 | 12:00 PM
  #129  
Currahee474's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,836
Likes: 0
From: Dirty Dena
Default

Originally Posted by ace123,May 16 2008, 12:51 PM
x^2 + y^2 = r^2 is the generic formula for a circle.
Isn't that the Pythagorean theorum? A^2 + B^2 = C^2.
Reply
Old May 16, 2008 | 12:04 PM
  #130  
Gymkata's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,720
Likes: 0
Default

In 2006, a 40-year old Russian Mathematician named Grigori Perelman of St. Petersberg finally proved then nearly-100-year-old mathematical mystery called Poincar
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:36 PM.