S2000 vs. SC430
that SC430 is major ugly, but they're for a slightly different customer. it's the futurized version of the old eldorado rag top- a luxuriously appointed, full featured cruiser. I ain't that old yet. did I say that it's ugly? it is UGLY.
I'm on the fence about this car. In all fairness it looks much better in silver...well doesn't every car 
It has some very interesting features but it also has some stupid design flaws. The rear seat is ridiculosly small. I've sat in the back of a Audi TT across town, but this cars seats are practically useless even with the seats all the way forward, and IMPOSSIBLE with the top up.

It has some very interesting features but it also has some stupid design flaws. The rear seat is ridiculosly small. I've sat in the back of a Audi TT across town, but this cars seats are practically useless even with the seats all the way forward, and IMPOSSIBLE with the top up.
To SiK182...I tangled briefly with one and it was actually pretty even. His torque down low killed the S, but at speed from a punch (after what seemed like a long while) I finally pulled ahead.
Originally posted by Moneeb
What are the 0-60 and 1/4 mile numbers on the SC430?
What are the 0-60 and 1/4 mile numbers on the SC430?




