Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

Say goodby to your pension

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 09:26 AM
  #1  
WarrenW's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,766
Likes: 8
From: Queens, NY
Default Say goodby to your pension

This from Yahoo:

Verizon Communications, the nation's second-largest telecom, said late Monday it was restructuring retirement benefits for 50,000 managers in a bid to save $3 billion over the next 10 years.

Under the plan, managers will no longer earn pension benefits or receive service credits toward retiree health care benefits starting in July.

Verizon is acquiring MCI, and the combined company will also increase the 401(k) matching dollars for about 30,000 MCI managers who join the company after the deal closes.

As companies look to control costs, even financially healthy employers are freezing or cutting pension plans in a sign the time-honored retirement system is increasingly being chipped away.

The trend drew the attention of President Bush on Monday, who called on companies to protect workers' retirement benefits.

"My message to Corporate America is: You need to fulfill your promises," Bush said in a speech in North Carolina in which he called for tougher pension-reform legislation.

Hewlett-Packard this year announced that it's ending guaranteed pensions for new workers. Others altering plans include Sears, which says it will freeze pension benefits in 2006, and Motorola, which stopped offering pensions to new employees this year.

In 2004, 71 companies in the Fortune 1,000 that sponsored traditional pensions froze or terminated their plans, according to a study released earlier this year by Watson Wyatt Worldwide, a human resources consulting firm. That represents an increase from 45 companies in 2003 and 39 companies in 2002.

When companies freeze a plan, they keep it in place but halt future benefits that would have been earned. Terminating a plan involves closing it down. More companies are also not offering pension plans to new hires. Driving the trend:

Reply
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 10:06 AM
  #2  
vader1's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,949
Likes: 474
From: MAHT-O-MEDI
Default

While I think that companies should be forced to live up to pension oblligations that they promised, moving to a defined contribution type plan is more than common. Very few industries still use defined benefit plans.

As a gov employee, I still have the option to go with a defined benefit or choose to take the earnings as a defined contribution plan. The benefit level has been whittled down so that you are punished severely for retiring before 65. I want to retire before that and my defined contribution estimates are much higher, almost double the monthly check. It puts more risk on my hands, but I am ok with that.

Stocks and bonds over the long haul are nothing to fear. I do not know who sold this tremendous risk theory to the american public.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 05:21 PM
  #3  
exceltoexcel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,938
Likes: 0
From: limerick
Default

They aren't offering it to their new employees, which is good. Pensions should never have been started, it was impossible to determine rather or not they could afford to pay the benifit down the road an we're seeing that now. Better to force employees to choose either to invest in 402k now or take a larger paycheck home. Puts the imvestment responsibility where it should be, in the employees hand.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 06:02 PM
  #4  
Penforhire's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,601
Likes: 1
From: La Habra
Default

Our company also cut off its defined benefit plan for new hires a couple of years back. Sucks to be a new guy!
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 04:02 PM
  #5  
steven975's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,094
Likes: 6
From: Vienna, VA
Default

at AT&T they stopped doing them in the late 90s right before I started there. My current company has a full 401K match, and I prefer that.

It is money that is mine, and it is growing FAST. It should, since I put $1200 a month into it! Also, I know the company is making good on the match as I am in a position to see they do.

The pension wasn't a bad idea, but with increasing life expectancies, they were bound to break sometime.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 05:17 PM
  #6  
BPUKiller's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

Pensions were created when people lived on average about 3 years after retiring.

Sam
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 08:29 PM
  #7  
steven975's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,094
Likes: 6
From: Vienna, VA
Default

that's right...well maybe 5

but now with people living 15-20 years after they retire, the system is strained.

That's the source of social secirity problems, too. The 7.65%*2 was based on life expectancy assumptions from a very long time ago with a set retirement age. One of the 2 must go up or the system will fall.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 10:49 AM
  #8  
HKStallion's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 15
From: Raleigh
Default

Management means all non union employees, of which i am one. not a big surprise to me, just wait a few years when they try to do this to the unions. one by one, you will see some long strikes as VZ execs try to take this away from them. On the bright side, they did raise the 401k match which makes me happier than a pension anyway.

Dave
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Spa02S2K
Off-topic Talk
12
Apr 15, 2005 12:44 PM
The Raptor
Off-topic Talk
10
Feb 16, 2005 02:28 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:00 AM.