Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

Stella Award

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 25, 2008 | 10:20 AM
  #11  
KeithM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 59,141
Likes: 1
From: Lost in the mountains
Default

Originally Posted by thebig33tuna,Aug 25 2008, 09:44 AM
the point of the lawsuit, and the point i'm going to make, is this: i've never had to get SKIN GRAFTS as a result of a spilled drink. have you? highly doubt it. until you do, and you're paying thousands of dollars for medical treatment, don't be so judgmental.
Im not stupid enough to drive with coffee between my legs so this is a moot argument
Old Aug 25, 2008 | 11:03 AM
  #12  
crdcz03's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 779
Likes: 5
Default

i clicked this thread expecting to read some new stories. this exact same post has been floating around the internet for years lolz
Old Aug 25, 2008 | 11:15 AM
  #13  
Nandska's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 17,254
Likes: 75
From: VA
Default

True. I guess I'll go ahead and close this thread.
Old Aug 25, 2008 | 11:15 AM
  #14  
JonBoy's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 19,734
Likes: 247
Default

I'll be going to trial for a personal injury claim against State Farm in the near future. Personal gain aside, I'd love to see them get nailed with a huge verdict just because they've been so retardedly horrible in the whole situation. I'm talking blatant ignorance, refusal to accept standard "proof" (doctors reports and receipts), and general "We don't believe a thing" attitude.

I faithfully filled out their paperwork in full, only to have them say the paperwork didn't have the information they required. Well, that's because they didn't request that information on any of their forms and never would because it would pin them down. The information/letters/certifications I provided them with signatures and dates "wasn't acceptable" because it wasn't on their forms. They intentionally set up their paperwork to exclude "proof" that would be damaging to them, refusing to take properly notated and dated employer and doctor forms/paperwork as sufficient proof. That's not only frustrating but, quite frankly, just flat out wrong.

They raise our rates on a yearly basis and provide less coverage yet stall and buck whenever it comes time to claim against them. I understand the need to not just hand money out to people but for heaven's sake, at least use a modicum of sense and intelligence when it comes to evaluating claims. It was like that Monty Python argument skit - "Yes I am" - "No, you aren't" - "Yes I am" - "No, you aren't" ad nauseum. Their constant "We don't believe it" in the face of proof positive of no prior conditions was ridiculous.

I used to have very little time for people that took insurance companies to court looking for a big settlement. Now, I completely understand why many do it. I'm not looking for a big settlement (would've settled for barely more than my costs - I just want my money back - but they weren't even close to that) but heaven knows, I'll stick 'em for every penny I can get. I'll need to get a significant settlement just to cover my own costs and pay my lawyer but I'll still get more money this way than I would on my own, unfortunately... If I took their initial offer, I'd have been out roughly $19K.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
spectacle
Off-topic Talk
84
Nov 2, 2009 12:15 PM
fat felix
Off-topic Talk
6
Apr 1, 2008 09:01 PM
trainwreck
Off-topic Talk
30
Jun 14, 2007 05:34 AM
Will
Off-topic Talk
16
Nov 10, 2006 06:50 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:22 PM.