Tomb Raider
My take: Angelina Jolie 3.0 stars (her role in "Gia" was much better
), However, the Film was only good for 1.5 stars. . .
As summer action films tgo, it was pretty lame. . . The scenes looked good but when compared to other action films (MI/MI2, India Jones, The Mummy films, etc. . .) it came up way short. . . Bad use of $8.50 and 90 minutes. . . In all fairness, Jolie played an excellent Lara Croft (personality wise, looks, etc. . .) but it wasn't enough to save a bad film. . .
Too bad, because it probably could have been a lot better (especially considering its star). . .
), However, the Film was only good for 1.5 stars. . . As summer action films tgo, it was pretty lame. . . The scenes looked good but when compared to other action films (MI/MI2, India Jones, The Mummy films, etc. . .) it came up way short. . . Bad use of $8.50 and 90 minutes. . . In all fairness, Jolie played an excellent Lara Croft (personality wise, looks, etc. . .) but it wasn't enough to save a bad film. . .
Too bad, because it probably could have been a lot better (especially considering its star). . .
So what was everyone expecting from this movie? You knew there wouldn't be any intelligent plot. The only reason Hollywood makes movies anymore is to keep stuntmen and special effects people in work. It's those guys (and lame writers) who are killing off any decent movies.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post








