Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

"Under God," Pledging is Out - Your .02!

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 27, 2002 | 08:47 AM
  #1  
Garyj's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
From: Redlands
Default "Under God," Pledging is Out - Your .02!

How soon we forget. Last year in September it was patriotism and religion everywhere. Flags, crosses, prayer meetings and God bless America's everywhere. This week there is an effort to halt it all. No more pledges in our public schools unless the wording is changed.

I'd bet there's some opinions on this one! Care to put in your .02?
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2002 | 09:13 AM
  #2  
TrojanHorse's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,772
Likes: 0
From: Signal Hill, SoCal
Default

I am all for the change. We are just putting the pledge back the way it was before 1954. What the hell is the big deal? Separation of Church and state is in the Constitution.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2002 | 09:15 AM
  #3  
S2K Fan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,898
Likes: 0
From: San Jose
Default

This is a great idea. Maybe then we'll start segregating people too. All Honda owners will live only in one region.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2002 | 09:22 AM
  #4  
TrojanHorse's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,772
Likes: 0
From: Signal Hill, SoCal
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by S2K Fan
[B]This is a great idea.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2002 | 10:00 AM
  #5  
gregstevens's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,263
Likes: 1
From: On the lakefront...
Default

Actually, there is no such clause in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights or in any official founding documents. The term 'separation of chuch and state' was coined in an essay written by Thomas Jefferson (if memory serves) which wanted a separation between the two so that the church would not be denigrated by being associated with "the state." It was meant to protect the church.

The only thing that the the Constitution says about this issue is that the state shall not establish a religion...this is known as the establishment clause and I believe this is in the First Amendment (again, if memory serves).

What do I think about it? (as if anyone cares) ... I'm ambivalent. The change was made in the 50's to combat the "godless" nature of the commies in Russia...it was all about castigating negativity on them, even though we were on the same side as Russia in WWII. Religion is a very personal thing and anytime the state involves itself in *anything* it screws it up. So taking it out does make sense from that perspective.

Is there harm in leaving it in? Nah, I don't think so. Is there harm in removing it? I don't think so, either. The founders didn't have it in there, so the argument that it's what the founders wanted just doesn't hold any water with me. If you say the pledge and it's officially "removed" put your own "under God" in there...aren't there more important things to be worried about? Seriously...sometimes I think this country needs a priority enema.


My 2 centavos...
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2002 | 10:03 AM
  #6  
Gowgom's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
Default

Originally posted by TrojanHorse


WTF does this mean? Anyone?
Sounds like sarcasm to me.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2002 | 10:11 AM
  #7  
TrojanHorse's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,772
Likes: 0
From: Signal Hill, SoCal
Default

Originally posted by Gowgom


Sounds like sarcasm to me.
I know he intended sarcasm but what does segregation of people have to do with separation of church and state? I could not seem to draw any parallels between the 2 issues.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2002 | 10:14 AM
  #8  
Gowgom's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
Default

I don't understand why this person who filed the lawsuit is making it a big deal. (They must have too much time on their hands.)

Jehovah's Witness and Jewish children aren't forced to recite it.

If it bothers you, don't listen. Ask to be excused from the classroom. Whatever it takes.

Next thing you know, they'll cover up the Ten Commandments in front of the courthouse in Philadelphia -- no wait, they've already done that.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2002 | 10:18 AM
  #9  
TrojanHorse's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,772
Likes: 0
From: Signal Hill, SoCal
Default

Nice short article on the history of the Pledge for all that care...

The Pledge of Allegiance - A Short History
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2002 | 10:19 AM
  #10  
Gowgom's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by TrojanHorse
[B]

I know he intended sarcasm but what does segregation of people have to do with separation of church and state?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:06 PM.