Why getting a girl is so hard
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,026
Likes: 0
From: the 'burgh/orlando/soCal soon!
Originally Posted by EastS2k,Dec 20 2010, 11:20 PM
I thought that the article was pretty funny and partially true, obviously take it with a grain of salt as it is inaccurate and meant as a joke, but some of the numbers in there are reasonable and makes you wonder.
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 112,963
Likes: 150
From: Doh!!
Originally Posted by TheSteel,Dec 20 2010, 07:09 PM
Satire or not, he's probably a worthless excuse of a life form who has probably never had a girlfriend who tried to be all cutesy in his retarded essay about how pathetic he is.
Congrats on almost being original on your post though.
Congrats on almost being original on your post though.
he made a movie about not getting a GF so he must be a loser too right?
I mean, making a movie is way more serious than making some essay on a website.
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,536
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, TX
Originally Posted by TheSteel,Dec 20 2010, 10:09 PM
Satire or not, he's probably a worthless excuse of a life form who has probably never had a girlfriend who tried to be all cutesy in his retarded essay about how pathetic he is.
Congrats on almost being original on your post though.
Congrats on almost being original on your post though.
Former Moderator
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,729
Likes: 8
"Spend life in North America"
"GERMAN research center for artificial intelligence."
Troll colleges = increase odds.
Troll women's colleges = really increase odds.
Lower standards = really really increase odds.
Lower standards and use internet = BINGO.
"GERMAN research center for artificial intelligence."
Troll colleges = increase odds.
Troll women's colleges = really increase odds.
Lower standards = really really increase odds.
Lower standards and use internet = BINGO.
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: Darien
Originally Posted by CKit,Dec 21 2010, 07:40 AM
Lower standards and use internet = BINGO.
Raise your standards and use the Internet, then simply sleep with all the chicks that are below your now higher standards and never call them back.. Soon you will fumble along and find someone who meets the now raised higher standards. If you don't succeed you will at least sleep with a bunch of chicks.
Not that I would ever do that
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,601
Likes: 1
From: La Habra
Cute essay but anyone who is only attracted to 1 in 44 of the women in his age range deserves to be alone, ha ha. That's far too picky.
And even one standard devation of intelligence above the mean is a lot. I wonder if the author meets his own standard? (speaking as a card carrying Mensan, lol)
There may also be some sampling errors in his reduction sequence. There may be more or less intelligence in the women he consider attractive than the average.
Based on his analysis work, I'd say less than 15.9% of eligible women would like him (his last cut). Who likes an anal retentive loser?
And even one standard devation of intelligence above the mean is a lot. I wonder if the author meets his own standard? (speaking as a card carrying Mensan, lol)
There may also be some sampling errors in his reduction sequence. There may be more or less intelligence in the women he consider attractive than the average.
Based on his analysis work, I'd say less than 15.9% of eligible women would like him (his last cut). Who likes an anal retentive loser?
