You've got to be kidding me...
KFC is only a TV dinner served not in front of the TV. I love the breast pieces they foist off on people. 3/4 back and 1/4 breast.
It is the worst fried chicken joint I know of so it won't be a problem not eating there.
Oh wait, I don't!
Cool I'm safe!!
No extraneous trans fat for me, I got my extra poundage the hard way - eating healthy - lots of it!
It is the worst fried chicken joint I know of so it won't be a problem not eating there.
Oh wait, I don't!
Cool I'm safe!!
No extraneous trans fat for me, I got my extra poundage the hard way - eating healthy - lots of it!
Originally Posted by WhiteS2k,Jun 13 2006, 05:44 PM
In a free-market economy, this sounds like a perfect opportunity for someone to step up and fill the void. If there is a demand for healthy food, then there should be people willing to supply it (for a price). 
Hell, if you advertise ANYTHING enough, people will buy it, whether they need or want it. The suggestion that "all one has to do is open a restaurant serving healthy food" to change the market is ludicrious, and highlights a gross ignorance of economics and reality.
I don't see people having a problem with the current limited bans on liquor and tobacco advertising, so why is fast food some sort of sacred cow? Imagine what would happen to McDonald's overnight if they couldn't advertise the shit out of their crap on TV and radio? It certainly doesn't taste good enough, and it isn't cheap enough, to survive on word-of-mouth alone.
The idea that an unregulated market will always benefit the citizen and society in general is a total crock, and hasn't had any creedence since people began taking history class.
Eat healthy or unhealthy is a lifestyle choice. Just because McDonald's advertises all over the media doesn't take away my own decision to eat what I choose to eat. Are you trying to argue that we have NO choice as to what we consume? One would argue that there's nothing but fast-food joints, but that's an issue of convenience. I can bring my own lunch to work, so why can't you or anyone else who chooses to eat healthier? Oh that's right, McDonald's told me this morning on the radio that I have to try their McRib sandwich (which is here for a limited time only). Please.
Originally Posted by no_really,Jun 13 2006, 03:30 PM
The main issue here is that if we let the market only offer unhealthy options, it is very tough for people to avoid them.
Originally Posted by no_really,Jun 13 2006, 08:14 PM
Hell, if you advertise ANYTHING enough, people will buy it, whether they need or want it. The suggestion that "all one has to do is open a restaurant serving healthy food" to change the market is ludicrious, and highlights a gross ignorance of economics and reality.
To be able to advertise on a national or state level you have to have mega bucks. Mom and Pop can't do that. Mega-corps or products with a super high profit margin are about the only ones that can.
Anything you see advertised on TV you can count that a major portion of the price you pay is for the advertising.
KFC does a lot of advertising. Go look at their product and then go to another chicken place and look at the difference in the food. It may not be home cookin' quality but it makes KFC look like a TV dinner.
I am against most of these types of suits, but then again the guys with the money can pretty well make their own rules so maybe these things do serve a purpose.
Originally Posted by THEOLDMAN,Jun 13 2006, 04:38 PM
It's real easy for consumers to stop eating at fast food places, no one is forcing anyone to eat that garbage. They just need to take some personal responsibility for their condition.
for all those who said personal responsibility:
I agree that one must be responsible for one's action but living in the USA, there is a certain amount of consumer's protection.
Case in point - warning labels on the side of a cigarette pack. as long as the consumer know about that, he/she can smoke to the heart's content.
we can bring up other examples galore.
the same with KFC. Trans fat is really bad for your arteries. The least KFC should do is to inform the consumers that their products contain trans fat - full disclosure.
this information is lacking to the average consumer.
How would we feel if cars dont have mandatory seatbelt but we have the choice to install them?
There is a certain amount of standard of consumer protection. I feel that KFC should at least inform the consumer of the use of trans fat.
I agree that one must be responsible for one's action but living in the USA, there is a certain amount of consumer's protection.
Case in point - warning labels on the side of a cigarette pack. as long as the consumer know about that, he/she can smoke to the heart's content.
we can bring up other examples galore.
the same with KFC. Trans fat is really bad for your arteries. The least KFC should do is to inform the consumers that their products contain trans fat - full disclosure.
this information is lacking to the average consumer.
How would we feel if cars dont have mandatory seatbelt but we have the choice to install them?
There is a certain amount of standard of consumer protection. I feel that KFC should at least inform the consumer of the use of trans fat.







