Official "Official" Forum All your "Official" threads!

Offical VOLK Racing Wheel Thread!

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 08:18 AM
  #841  
ungucpho's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 3
Default

volks have really gone up in price, i remember the days where you can get a set of 18's for under 2 grand, i got my 19" LE37's for my audi for 2400 and i thought that was a lot.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 09:33 AM
  #842  
KillerBlackbird's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 392
Likes: 1
From: Vermont
Default

Originally Posted by ungucpho
volks have really gone up in price, i remember the days where you can get a set of 18's for under 2 grand, i got my 19" LE37's for my audi for 2400 and i thought that was a lot.
Same here.
It seems like you pay the same price now for just wheels as you would've paid for a set with tires back then haha. Like everything else, it goes up in price I guess.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 04:44 PM
  #843  
NFR_AP2's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,925
Likes: 8
From: Largo, FL
Default

remember the value of the american dollar is decreasing
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 06:24 PM
  #844  
aozora's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne
Default

17x10 +45 or 17x9.5 +35 non staggered for track work?

I've got flared OEM front guards and the usual lip and bumper tab relocated... Running 17x9 +45 atm with any issues f20kills seems to vote for the 17x10s...
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 06:55 PM
  #845  
//steve\\'s Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,465
Likes: 52
From: ATL
Default

^The 17x10 +45 will be significantly easier to make fit and will be better on the track anyways.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 08:29 PM
  #846  
s2kslav's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 6
From: Long Island
Default

the difference between 10 +45 and 9.5 +35 is 3mm, the real difference is in tire choice, i wanted to keep my 255 contact patch so it seemed that 10 was the right choice, because it should stretch similarly to a 245 on a 9.5 hope the hub depth is the only difference between the sizes, as far as face is concerned. NFR what did you end up ordering?
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 09:14 PM
  #847  
s2kslav's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 6
From: Long Island
Default

oh man guys, i just had an epiphany, i dont know if its too late to change up the order, but i realized maybe 17x10 +50 in the front and 17x10 +45 in the rear might be an awesome choice. that way i think its the same lip all around with same width but a staggered look, flat face front and concave rear. plus it wil be easier to fit in the front. now im second guessing it, what do you think?
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 10:05 PM
  #848  
s2sik's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,195
Likes: 0
Default

you want a staggered face look? i say concave all around
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2011 | 05:20 AM
  #849  
//steve\\'s Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,465
Likes: 52
From: ATL
Default

Biggest problem going staggered offsets on the same width wheel with the same tire is now you can't rotate them. I'd much rather be able to rotate and then replace 4 tires at a time not just 2 over and over again.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2011 | 06:01 AM
  #850  
s2kslav's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 6
From: Long Island
Default

yeah plus the option of having room for a bbk down the road unless the spoon calipers do work wth a 10+45. i forgot about the rotation benefits, thats a good point.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:14 AM.