Ohio S2000 Club Ohio S2000 Owners Club

Your thoughts

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 04:34 AM
  #1  
efthimios's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 14,430
Likes: 1
From: OH
Unhappy Your thoughts

on 2 types of cars for to take place of the Taurus......I'm looking at 1995-1997/8 models

*these 2 where just random pix*

3.5RL



2.5TL

Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 04:51 AM
  #2  
switchcars's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,276
Likes: 0
Default

I vote RL....no particular reason, but that I like big sedans.

both good choices though
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 05:33 AM
  #3  
Bullitt44's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,231
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, OH
Default

Either one for the right price.

can we bronze the taurus and mount it in your basement?
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 05:38 AM
  #4  
soundzero's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,536
Likes: 1
Default

Screw both cars.
what you need is Volvo. 98 or 99 S70 GLT would be a wiser choice.


Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 05:38 AM
  #5  
David1's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,115
Likes: 7
Default

Make sure that the timing belt and water pump have beed replaced! It's not cheap. Also, stay away from 95 cars since the AC is R12 and if there is a problem with it, it will need to be converted to 134A. On a ford or GM it can be cheap to convert, about 300 bucks, but on most of the older imports you have to change the compressor and most of the lines and is cost prohibitive to do on an older model.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 06:47 AM
  #6  
Scott Evil's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,891
Likes: 0
From: Westerville OH
Default

Timmy the second pic looks like a Vigor, not a TL. Stay away from those, they rust.

The prior gen TLs were pretty tough cars. Probably a good buy.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 06:51 AM
  #7  
Dr. Fob's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Default

Isn't there a big price difference between the 3.5RL and the 2.5TL? It would make more sense if you're comparing the RL with a 3.2TL.

In any event, the 2.5L five cylinder was from the Vigor, while the 3.2 V6 was used in the last Legend. Both are left-over motors that are outdated. The 2.5 is especially noisy and rough compared to the 3.2. In addition, the first-gen TL is not roomy. Headroom and kneeroom are compromised and it is difficult getting in the back due to the tight angle formed by the C-pillar and rear frameless window. My dad used to drive one and I hit my head multiple times.

Do you need to transport clients? If so, then the 3.5RL would be better. It has a much bigger interior, softer ride, and more overall refinement. If I remember correctly, it also has stability/traction control. On another note, have you considered a Lexus ES300? The second-gen ES was introduced shortly after the first-gen TL. I think it's a better car.

Wait, you're too young to drive these cars. They belong to your father. Get a WRX!!
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 07:08 AM
  #8  
DiscLarry's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
From: Dublin, OH
Default

Originally Posted by david1,Dec 15 2005, 06:38 AM
Make sure that the timing belt and water pump have beed replaced! It's not cheap. Also, stay away from 95 cars since the AC is R12 and if there is a problem with it, it will need to be converted to 134A. On a ford or GM it can be cheap to convert, about 300 bucks, but on most of the older imports you have to change the compressor and most of the lines and is cost prohibitive to do on an older model.
I thought 94 was the last year for R12. I have a 95 Integra, and I'm sure its R134, because I had it leak checked and recharged last year.

-Larry
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 07:21 AM
  #9  
David1's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,115
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by DiscLarry,Dec 15 2005, 11:08 AM
I thought 94 was the last year for R12. I have a 95 Integra, and I'm sure its R134, because I had it leak checked and recharged last year.

-Larry
It varied by manufacturer. All of Chryslers vehicals were changed over in 96. It was about half and half in 95.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 07:24 AM
  #10  
David1's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,115
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by Scott Evil,Dec 15 2005, 10:47 AM
Timmy the second pic looks like a Vigor, not a TL. Stay away from those, they rust.

The prior gen TLs were pretty tough cars. Probably a good buy.
Looks like a 2.7 TL. The Vigor was more square on the front and was shorter.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:49 AM.