Nikon D80 lens question
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: socal
Posts: 6,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nikon D80 lens question
i posted this in OT forum, but maybe this is the right place to post this instead.
for a Nikon D80, would it be better off to have the 18-135mm kit lens + the nikkor 12-24mm wide angle or to have the 18-200mm VR as the only lens?
for a Nikon D80, would it be better off to have the 18-135mm kit lens + the nikkor 12-24mm wide angle or to have the 18-200mm VR as the only lens?
#2
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When I picked up my D80, I went with the body only and grabbed an 18-200 VR with it.
Understanding that Im a novice, I love that 18-200VR for what it is: the perfect walkaround lens. It has far enough reach for anything that is not specialized, its fast enough, focuses fast, clear....
If you suspect that you will end up using the 12-24 the most (I find I do not use the low end of the VR range that often), Id consider the two lenses. If you believe that you'll use the 18-135 more often (I have no personal experience with that lens), Id just skip it and go for the VR.
It is an AWESOME do everything well lens.
Understanding that Im a novice, I love that 18-200VR for what it is: the perfect walkaround lens. It has far enough reach for anything that is not specialized, its fast enough, focuses fast, clear....
If you suspect that you will end up using the 12-24 the most (I find I do not use the low end of the VR range that often), Id consider the two lenses. If you believe that you'll use the 18-135 more often (I have no personal experience with that lens), Id just skip it and go for the VR.
It is an AWESOME do everything well lens.
#3
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Reston, VA
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you probably would not use the 'kit' lens very long.
I don't think 18-135mm and 12-24mm is a good combo.
18-135 doesn't have the picture quality to begin with and 12-24 certainly is a nice wide angle but distortion and Chromatic Abberation is noticeble.
18-200 isn't a 'IT' lens for nikon but it certainly gets all the job done with out a hitch. picture quality is good.
here's my sample with 18-200mm VR
@ 18mm
@ 200mm
also shot @ 18mm
bottom line...you won't regret with 18-200mm VR... I think you will regret with 18-135 and 12-24 combo.
get the 18-200mm VR now..and add 12-24mm to your collection later.
I don't think 18-135mm and 12-24mm is a good combo.
18-135 doesn't have the picture quality to begin with and 12-24 certainly is a nice wide angle but distortion and Chromatic Abberation is noticeble.
18-200 isn't a 'IT' lens for nikon but it certainly gets all the job done with out a hitch. picture quality is good.
here's my sample with 18-200mm VR
@ 18mm
@ 200mm
also shot @ 18mm
bottom line...you won't regret with 18-200mm VR... I think you will regret with 18-135 and 12-24 combo.
get the 18-200mm VR now..and add 12-24mm to your collection later.
#4
Originally Posted by bluextc,Jun 14 2007, 05:09 AM
you probably would not use the 'kit' lens very long.
I don't think 18-135mm and 12-24mm is a good combo.
18-135 doesn't have the picture quality to begin with and 12-24 certainly is a nice wide angle but distortion and Chromatic Abberation is noticeble.
18-200 isn't a 'IT' lens for nikon but it certainly gets all the job done with out a hitch. picture quality is good.
here's my sample with 18-200mm VR
@ 18mm
@ 200mm
also shot @ 18mm
bottom line...you won't regret with 18-200mm VR... I think you will regret with 18-135 and 12-24 combo.
get the 18-200mm VR now..and add 12-24mm to your collection later.
I don't think 18-135mm and 12-24mm is a good combo.
18-135 doesn't have the picture quality to begin with and 12-24 certainly is a nice wide angle but distortion and Chromatic Abberation is noticeble.
18-200 isn't a 'IT' lens for nikon but it certainly gets all the job done with out a hitch. picture quality is good.
here's my sample with 18-200mm VR
@ 18mm
@ 200mm
also shot @ 18mm
bottom line...you won't regret with 18-200mm VR... I think you will regret with 18-135 and 12-24 combo.
get the 18-200mm VR now..and add 12-24mm to your collection later.
Great shots!
When I had my D70, even though it came with the good 18-70 lens, I ended up buying the 18-200vr and used it all the time. Right now I'm having a blast with the d80 and the 18-200 vr. It's a great lens to have as you're "all-in-one" unless you don't mind carrying a bunch of lenses when you're out and about. The price is worth it to have the vr in the lens!
#5
That 18-200VR is a neat lens, the only down side, is the down side. When you point the lens down, the zoom mechanism will creep, slip and slide. Otherwise, it is a great sharp lens that allows you to get away from shooting hand held in low light with VR. It's a lot lighter than my 70-200VR and IQ isn't too far off.
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Reston, VA
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pointa-b-c,Jun 26 2007, 09:16 AM
That 18-200VR is a neat lens, the only down side, is the down side. When you point the lens down, the zoom mechanism will creep, slip and slide. Otherwise, it is a great sharp lens that allows you to get away from shooting hand held in low light with VR. It's a lot lighter than my 70-200VR and IQ isn't too far off.
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by chartchaiganan,Jun 26 2007, 11:57 AM
18-200VR lens is hard to come by since it's out of stock alot no?
#9
FYI Calumet has them in stock right now which is very rare. They are also offering one of the cheapest prices I have seen for this lens. I really wish I could afford it right not but I am afraid it will have to wait a couple of months.
http://www.calumetphoto.com/item/NT21378/
http://www.calumetphoto.com/item/NT21378/