NYC 16 Shot Pano Problem
#1
NYC 16 Shot Pano Problem
Anyone know why the sky, what looks like different steps, has different shades? This a pano shot consisting for 16 shots. Each shot has that hard edge light fall off. I was under a lamp post, would the stray light from the post do this? Sorry for the newb ques.
The shot was taken w/ a Sigma 30mm consisting of 16shots. The shot was taken in manual (always) f/16 @ 30secs. I AF on the Empire State building & set the focus on manual thereafter. I started from the left to the right. I have a feeling that the lamp post on my left side caused stray light. Although the lens did have a hood.
The shot is unedited, except for the photomerge.
Here's another pano taken in a different location. This is a 6shot pano taken w/ a 50mm, manual, f/16 @ 30secs. This example shows no hard edge shade fall off.
The shot was taken w/ a Sigma 30mm consisting of 16shots. The shot was taken in manual (always) f/16 @ 30secs. I AF on the Empire State building & set the focus on manual thereafter. I started from the left to the right. I have a feeling that the lamp post on my left side caused stray light. Although the lens did have a hood.
The shot is unedited, except for the photomerge.
Here's another pano taken in a different location. This is a 6shot pano taken w/ a 50mm, manual, f/16 @ 30secs. This example shows no hard edge shade fall off.
#2
it's because each individual shot was metered independenly. This results in the sky being a slightly different shade in every shot.
You need to set your camera on a manual mode, or otherwise lock the exposure setting prior to doing a panorama series. The other, less desireable option is to use photoshop or something to blend the edges together. You can probably successfully blend the edges in the one you already took. It looks good BTW.
You need to set your camera on a manual mode, or otherwise lock the exposure setting prior to doing a panorama series. The other, less desireable option is to use photoshop or something to blend the edges together. You can probably successfully blend the edges in the one you already took. It looks good BTW.
#3
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Branford, CT
Posts: 6,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by no_really,Dec 18 2006, 10:20 AM
it's because each individual shot was metered independenly. This results in the sky being a slightly differnt shade in every shot.
You need to set your camera on a manual mode, or otherwise lock the exosure setting prior to doing a panorama series. The other, less desireable option is to use photoshop or something to blend the edges together. You can probably successfully blend the edges in the one you already took. It looks good BTW.
You need to set your camera on a manual mode, or otherwise lock the exosure setting prior to doing a panorama series. The other, less desireable option is to use photoshop or something to blend the edges together. You can probably successfully blend the edges in the one you already took. It looks good BTW.
#4
How do you lock the exposure?? (Breaks out the manual as we speak). Oh ok got it. I'll go back tonight & take another shot(s). This time w/ the exposure locked. Thanks!!! I'll post results tonight.
#6
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Branford, CT
Posts: 6,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by iLuveketchup,Dec 18 2006, 11:16 AM
How do you lock the exposure?? (Breaks out the manual as we speak). Oh ok got it. I'll go back tonight & take another shot(s). This time w/ the exposure locked. Thanks!!! I'll post results tonight.
Trending Topics
#9
Originally Posted by Penforhire,Dec 18 2006, 02:12 PM
Lock the white balance either in-camera or in raw conversion too!
#10
you know, the problem is probably the lens. Wides commonly have issues with light fall-off as you get to the edges, and the particular way your panoramic scene is put together is probably exaggerating the issue. In many cases, the corners can be a full stop off of the center of the image. Most 50mm lenses don't exhibit any light fall-off at all, which is why your 50mm panoramic looks so smooth.
There's nothing wrong with the particular lens, nor is this problem confined to Sigma. It's just a function of wide angle lenses.
There's nothing wrong with the particular lens, nor is this problem confined to Sigma. It's just a function of wide angle lenses.