S2000 Electronics Information and discussion related to S2000 electronics such as ICE, GPS, and alarms.

Alpine or Polk Components?

Thread Tools
 
Old May 12, 2010 | 05:53 AM
  #11  
TrackStar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,988
Likes: 3
From: Franklin Lakes
Default

I know, just make sure the crossovers are of a higher quality.
Reply
Old May 16, 2010 | 11:47 AM
  #12  
ficoy's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: South Bay Area, CA
Default

I was looking into these as well.

The MM6501's Has higher sensitivity/efficiency than the type R's (94db vs 87db).
The Polk's also have 125 RMS compared to Alpine's 110 but i don't understand why it's peak is 250... lower than Alpine's 330.

Also, will these drop right in?
Reply
Old May 16, 2010 | 12:32 PM
  #13  
MEGURO<->2006's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Default

I have the MM6501"s in my S and I think they sound great. They require a good amount of break-in though. When you first listen to them, you may think that they don't sound very good, but they really open up tremendously after the break-in period. The stock basket must be removed upon installation. The brackets supplied by Polk will work fine in the stock position. I paired mine with an MM series 12" sub and in my opinion it sounds wonderful.
Reply
Old May 17, 2010 | 01:12 AM
  #14  
CreAziaN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Default

Originally Posted by ficoy,May 16 2010, 11:47 AM
I was looking into these as well.

The MM6501's Has higher sensitivity/efficiency than the type R's (94db vs 87db).
The Polk's also have 125 RMS compared to Alpine's 110 but i don't understand why it's peak is 250... lower than Alpine's 330.

Also, will these drop right in?
yeah, I noticed the peak power goes to the Type Rs

I'm looking for speakers that have a better low frequency response since i wont be running a sub

I think I'm leaning towards the MM6501's though
Reply
Old May 17, 2010 | 01:13 AM
  #15  
CreAziaN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Default

Originally Posted by MEGURO<->2006,May 16 2010, 12:32 PM
I have the MM6501"s in my S and I think they sound great. They require a good amount of break-in though. When you first listen to them, you may think that they don't sound very good, but they really open up tremendously after the break-in period. The stock basket must be removed upon installation. The brackets supplied by Polk will work fine in the stock position. I paired mine with an MM series 12" sub and in my opinion it sounds wonderful.
how is the bass on the MM6501's? What amp are you using with it and how much power are you feeding them?
Reply
Old May 17, 2010 | 07:27 AM
  #16  
MEGURO<->2006's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CreAziaN,May 17 2010, 01:13 AM
how is the bass on the MM6501's? What amp are you using with it and how much power are you feeding them?
I currently have a very small Sony XM-4S powering them. They sound great and the bass response in my opnion is good as well. I originally went with this amp because I was looking to save weight and it fit the bill perfectly. I think they would sound even better with a more powerful amp. The speakers themselves are very light, but very well made. I cannot stress enough that they require a break in period though. Right after I installed them my first impresion was that they sound like the db series they replaced, but after a few weeks all I can say is that it is night and day. I don't think anyone should be expecting thundering bass from their components. These speakers provide a very nice clean sound, play loud and are 500 X better the stock system. The bass response is excellent and I really think you will like them, just don't judge them until after the break-in because there is a huge difference.
Reply
Old May 18, 2010 | 08:30 AM
  #17  
JaeOne3345's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Corona, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Ryans2kGPW,May 9 2010, 09:22 PM
would like to know some suggestions as welll
im using sps-600c comps too
I also have an 8" jl audio. both powered by alpine mrp-f300
How is this set up working out for you?

Is the JL mounted in the trunk? I am looking into that same amp. Where did you mount it?
Reply
Old May 24, 2010 | 01:27 PM
  #18  
soichiro_h's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Default

I have the Polk MM6501s. They will not fit in the stock baskets even if you cut out the back. You'll need to make MDF brackets. I think these speakers sound amazing, even though I'm driving them with the stock '08 HU right now. Some may find them a little bright/harsh, but I like that. You can set the tweeters for -3dB on the xover. With such high sensitivity, they get really loud with a surprising bass. I did just get a Kenwood KDC-X994 HU I'll be installing later though. Even with the stock HU, I'm still happy enough with the volume and bass to not want to add a sub, as ultimate sound reproduction is not my number one priority in this car.
Reply
Old May 24, 2010 | 01:46 PM
  #19  
Will's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,560
Likes: 1
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

Originally Posted by soichiro_h,May 24 2010, 01:27 PM
I have the Polk MM6501s. They will not fit in the stock baskets even if you cut out the back.
That's interesting; out of curiosity, what causes them not to fit? Is it the diameter of the speaker compared to the baskets themselves?
Reply
Old May 24, 2010 | 04:30 PM
  #20  
soichiro_h's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE=Will,May 24 2010, 01:46 PM]That's interesting; out of curiosity, what causes them not to fit?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:32 PM.