idea afr ratio
On my H22 with bolt on's, I was running,
WOT 13.0
part throttle 14.7
cruising 16.0
And that was with DSM 450's. Not bad for injectors that were designed 2 decades ago. Curios as to how this will compare to an F20/22 with OEM injectors.
WOT 13.0
part throttle 14.7
cruising 16.0
And that was with DSM 450's. Not bad for injectors that were designed 2 decades ago. Curios as to how this will compare to an F20/22 with OEM injectors.
Originally Posted by maluch,Oct 12 2010, 10:43 AM
12.5 is very rich I was thinking more along the lines of 13.4....
Did you see this ideal afr vary with rpms?
Did you see this ideal afr vary with rpms?
BTW, I haven't noticed any fluctuation in ideal AFR's based on RPM. When I overlay different torque curves from other calibrations I've tried, the only thing that seems to change the shape of the torque curve seems to be VTEC engagement and ignition timing. However, with a piggy back, that would be totally different, since timing and fuel are linked by MAP. You might find that best power with a VAFC would come from a wildly fluctuating AFR.
for most NA honda's 13.3-13.5:1 will give you the best power, you will see increasing power loss once you get richer than 13:1.
for cruise, these things dont care.. 14-17:1 works.. part throttle acceleration will see a big hit as far as economy goes if you are richer than 14:1 and crappy response leaner than 15:1
for cruise, these things dont care.. 14-17:1 works.. part throttle acceleration will see a big hit as far as economy goes if you are richer than 14:1 and crappy response leaner than 15:1
Trending Topics
I guess I should add that the 12.5 I'm talking about is from the OEM wideband, which Hondata says reads richer than it really is. The "AF Corr" value is about 13.5, but I don't believe it is nearly that lean. My aftermarket wideband reports richer than the AF Corr value, but I haven't installed it since I tuned it richer. I guess I need to do that again soon.




