S2000 Engine Management Engine management topics, map and advice.

Timing/Ignition Tuning

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 17, 2010 | 04:16 AM
  #11  
Gernby's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

That has been my approach. I first smoothed out the curves for each load line, then added a degree, then did some datalogs. If I got a single knock count, then I would record the cylinder number and RPM in a log, and retard timing on that cylinder by 1 degree. I repeated this several times over several days. If I saw a pattern in my hand written log that more knock counts were happening at a certain RPM, then I would just retard timing at that RPM instead of using individual cylinder trims.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2010 | 12:23 AM
  #12  
crazysupratt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,624
Likes: 0
Default

cool thats the same method that I was going to do... how much timing have you advance so far?
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2010 | 12:24 AM
  #13  
crazysupratt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,624
Likes: 0
Default

you're lucky you have 93 over there still...stupid 91 octane. haha
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2010 | 05:46 AM
  #14  
Gernby's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

I believe this is the most agressive timing I've run, but I've pulled some of that back down recently to eliminate knock counts. Blue is the stock curve, and both of these were when MAP was about 960 mBar.

Name:  untitled4.jpg
Views: 2365
Size:  29.0 KB
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2010 | 05:49 AM
  #15  
Gernby's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

BTW, I've also filled in the timing "dip" between 2300 and 3200 by creating a timing "spike" on the timing map, so my current timing curve is much more smooth. I should also mention that my VTEC engages at 3700 RPMs.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2010 | 05:55 AM
  #16  
Gernby's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

Here is my current timing curve at 970 mBar.

Name:  untitled-1.jpg
Views: 2359
Size:  23.9 KB
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2010 | 04:00 PM
  #17  
crazysupratt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,624
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gernby,Apr 19 2010, 06:46 AM
I believe this is the most agressive timing I've run, but I've pulled some of that back down recently to eliminate knock counts. Blue is the stock curve, and both of these were when MAP was about 960 mBar.

you advance timing quite a bit from stock. How does your car feel with the timing advance?

even in the lower RPM, 4-6k, i see you increase it roughly by 7-10 degree.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2010 | 04:58 PM
  #18  
Gernby's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

It feels really smooth. However, smoothness comes with psychological tradeoffs, since it doesn't toss my head back.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2010 | 12:50 PM
  #19  
crazysupratt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,624
Likes: 0
Default

i adjusted individual knock for each cylinder by advancing it by 1 degree across the board. Ran the car and got a knock count on cylinder 2 and 4 at around 3800 RPM. Just one count on 2 and 4. Not too bad but still a knock count. I'm going to adjust the timing map around 3800 and see if I can elimate that count. I only did 2 run so maybe I need to do a few more before adjusting.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2010 | 03:26 PM
  #20  
silvermonster's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
From: Davis
Default

bringing this back up. How much timing are you increasing? Do I do it by the cylinder trim method or do I just increase the timing on column 9-10 for WOT only?

any input on how to go about this. Thanks.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:00 AM.