~ Updated ~ Forced Induction Option Comparison
Gotta defend my Comptech
This is a comparison between 4 cars dynoed on Comptech's Dyno Dynamics (similar to a Mustan Dyno). Fyi, Comptech only dynos in 3rd gear. All cars are at stock boost, each with varying modifications.
Gary (mine): PP, FW, Disk, Exhaust, Test pipe, Krankvents
2005: PP and Disk, all else stock
2004: Stock
2003: Stock
Comptech dynoed my car again and got 304whp and 200wtq, but I dont' have that dyno info. They gave me the other 05's dyno data, and the 04 and 03 are off their website.


This is a comparison between 4 cars dynoed on Comptech's Dyno Dynamics (similar to a Mustan Dyno). Fyi, Comptech only dynos in 3rd gear. All cars are at stock boost, each with varying modifications.Gary (mine): PP, FW, Disk, Exhaust, Test pipe, Krankvents
2005: PP and Disk, all else stock
2004: Stock
2003: Stock
Comptech dynoed my car again and got 304whp and 200wtq, but I dont' have that dyno info. They gave me the other 05's dyno data, and the 04 and 03 are off their website.


Originally Posted by AusS2000,Feb 27 2006, 07:13 PM
However they do show the shape of things. You can clearly see how the BRP has a low end advantage over the Comptech.
The point being made is that all the graphs were from different dynos on different days. My point was that even if you don't accept the top end figures you can clearly see the slope. And that is the true advantage over an centrifugal SC.
Hey, slimjim, next time I have to head down to your neck of the woods, maybe we can meet up. You can get a first hand ride in a CT sc'd S and tell me what you think.
I'm only about 65 miles from you.
I'm only about 65 miles from you.
Originally Posted by XclusiveAutosports,Feb 27 2006, 05:22 PM
Nice work slimjim. BRP, how do your current torque graphs compare to those, are they the same or different?
Originally Posted by kane.s2k,Feb 27 2006, 07:48 PM
None of these graphs are valid. Different dyno's, different conditions, different cars, different corrections, etc.
Originally Posted by azrael,Feb 27 2006, 05:48 PM
The only other thing I'd mention here is that these graphs start at 3000 RPM. The BRP SC has quite an advantage over any other form of FI in the low-end, and these graphs don't really show that.
Not all dyno plots had data that low. Same applies to the top end. This shows the meat of the power band really.
Originally Posted by FF2Skip,Feb 28 2006, 12:51 AM
Hey, slimjim, next time I have to head down to your neck of the woods, maybe we can meet up. You can get a first hand ride in a CT sc'd S and tell me what you think.
I'm only about 65 miles from you.
I'm only about 65 miles from you.
Originally Posted by Joe @ BRP,Feb 28 2006, 09:48 AM
They are better. We had a problem with the power falling off up top, now it doesn't do that. Peak torque was 217 and horsepower was 314.8. Looking at the two side to side (our dyno and the graphs slimjim made), it looks like our kit would actually be making more than the Lovefab all any given RPM. We posted the dyno on our forum and someone else reposted it in the BRP thread that someone started here as well. I don't think I can do any kind of linking so you'll have to search for them. 

On that same note though, if we compared the Lovefab GT1 kit to the BRP kit on the same dyno, same day, same car, etc.... the BRP kit would have a noticeable advantage until around 4000-4500 RPM and then the Lovefab would take off.
I really wanted to get away from a dyno disussion because it will turn into a big cluster****, but Lovefab's numbers are with a Mustang dyno...
Regardless of everything really, just look at the Torque and Power Advantage over Stock Graphs. Calculate the area under the curve and divide by the price of the kit. Performance per dollar ratio. No matter what dyno you test the kits on, BRP and Lovefab would anihilate the Comptech and Vortech offerings in this respect.
Unless you stole your kit. Then you win.
I realize that the Lovefab was on a Mustang and we use a Dynojet. I just didn't want to get punched for mentioning it.
My last post was based only on the graphs you posted and our dynojet.
Just curious, how much boost is each kit running on the graphs you posted?
My last post was based only on the graphs you posted and our dynojet.
Just curious, how much boost is each kit running on the graphs you posted?



