S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

19-20 psi poor performance

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 04:22 PM
  #1  
ChefJ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,659
Likes: 3
From: Braselton, GA
Default 19-20 psi poor performance

I just had my tuning appointment today after a clutch and larger injector install. I was running about 75% c16 and 25% 93 octane so we pulled some timing. The numbers are poor at best for what we were expecting. Any idea of what could have caused these numbers?? He is a fairly good tuner. sc61 with .63 hot side, 3mm IP gasket and AEM EMS. We were around 19-20 psi on these pulls.






This is the plot from last summer at around 13.5 psi on a 50/50 mix of 110 and 93 octane.

Reply
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 04:56 PM
  #2  
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
Default

What manifold?
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 05:00 PM
  #3  
ChefJ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,659
Likes: 3
From: Braselton, GA
Default

IP log.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 05:04 PM
  #4  
ChefJ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,659
Likes: 3
From: Braselton, GA
Default

6152e compressor
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 05:14 PM
  #5  
candymanjl's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Lauderdale
Default

that log manifold is going to spool up slower, effecting the midrange, and flow less up top, effecting your top end. just changing to a tubular manifold will give you power all over.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 05:17 PM
  #6  
ChefJ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,659
Likes: 3
From: Braselton, GA
Default

^ I need to find a good deal on one and then re-plumb the hot side piping. I think I need a larger hot side turbo housing aswell.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 05:40 PM
  #7  
Revenge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
From: Annapolis MD
Default

^I agree, what exhaust are you running, single dual. I think your number are pretty good, close to 450hp. Last I checked that pretty bad ass.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 05:43 PM
  #8  
kawi10r998cc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Default

With the setup you're running...19-20psi and just under 450hp seems about right. Remember it's not all about psi...it's more about cfm and temp and with the log mani and that turbo I'd say you're pretty limited. Go with a tubular mani and ball bearing turbo (unless that already is but I believe it's journal) and you'll see a better number with lower psi...but I'm no expert so take it for what it's worth...that psi would get you closer to 480-500 with a slightly better setup.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 05:49 PM
  #9  
ChefJ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,659
Likes: 3
From: Braselton, GA
Default

single exhaust 3" all the way back no restrictions.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 06:11 PM
  #10  
timg's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,160
Likes: 35
From: Decatur, GA
Default

A log manifold + small turbine housing will definitely reduce your efficiency (and the horsepower for any given boost level).

Tim
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:33 AM.