Any old SC owners regret going turbo ?
I think the problem with most turbo cars is that everyone gets greedy and ups the boost, and things break. No surprise. If you want to compare your run of the mill SC setup to a turbo setup, a comparable turbo setup would be a greddy kit. The greddy kits seem to be very reliable and people have no problem eclipsing 300whp with a very nice powerband. On top of that, a lot of turbo kits aren't very "complete" which leaves a lot up to the person installing things to "fix" these problems.
Originally Posted by lotus7racer' timestamp='1367578089' post='22516536
In regards to Honda s2000 forced induction install, I rather use a supercharger because of the anemic torque.
I dont recall any S2k kits coming with more than a turbo blanket.
I was supercharged, now turbo. What a difference, IMO turbo FTW hands down.
My car now would have murdered my car when it was s/c.
Each to there own though. Do whatever you feel is better for you I guess.
I thought I made the right choice going supercharged. I was WRONG.
My car now would have murdered my car when it was s/c.
Each to there own though. Do whatever you feel is better for you I guess.
I thought I made the right choice going supercharged. I was WRONG.
Can't comment on the switch, but knowing what I do now, I would have held out for a turbo kit. But I still really do enjoy the on/off predictability of the throttle on my supercharged S. But also high horsepower is really only useable at a dragstrip, anything over 500 on the street you aren't going to really be able to put down and use it.









