S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Any supercharged S2k's in 11's or 10's?

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 12:36 PM
  #1  
///M3an Machine's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Thousand Oaks
Default Any supercharged S2k's in 11's or 10's?

Just curious, any supercharged cars in the 11's or 10's at the drag strip? On dragtimes.com the 11 and 10 second cars are turbo'd...
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 12:55 PM
  #2  
camuman's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,044
Likes: 6
From: South Florida
Default

hmmm, if the higher HP CT/VT guys ran at the track they would def be in the 11's. a 361whp SC car just hit 12.23@113. and there are SC cars making 400-450whp dynojet. its def possible, but i honestly dont know if anyone has run there 400+ SC car down the 1320
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 02:31 PM
  #3  
RAIN H8R's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,757
Likes: 120
From: Waukesha, WI
Default

^^True. Usually the SC guys are not 1/4 freaks like the turbo guys are...
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 06:32 PM
  #4  
S2SEXY's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,038
Likes: 0
Default

next year im going 14psi and will hopefully be the first ctsc in the 11's
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 09:11 PM
  #5  
///M3an Machine's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Thousand Oaks
Default

[QUOTE=camuman,Oct 5 2009, 12:55 PM]hmmm, if the higher HP CT/VT guys ran at the track they would def be in the 11's.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 03:05 AM
  #6  
RAIN H8R's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,757
Likes: 120
From: Waukesha, WI
Default

not to mention the F20C has "no torque"
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 05:19 AM
  #7  
S2SEXY's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,038
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ///M3an Machine,Oct 5 2009, 09:11 PM
Also, Camuman, how come that guy is a whole second faster than your car with just a tad more hp?
it has to do with the 60 foot.for every .1 you take off the 60ft you gain .2 in the quarter.
so if we went 2.0 in my car it would have went 12.7
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Oct 6, 2009 | 06:30 AM
  #8  
camuman's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,044
Likes: 6
From: South Florida
Default

Originally Posted by ///M3an Machine,Oct 6 2009, 01:11 AM
wow that's pretty good. 450rwhp should be mid-low 11's then. Do you have a link to info about that run? Also, Camuman, how come that guy is a whole second faster than your car with just a tad more hp?
i have to launch like a man. the 2.0 i cut was in hot humid south florida and launching at 3500 rpm

when the weather gets down into the 60's gonna go back and launch real deal. see if i can get a better time
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 09:28 AM
  #9  
freshs2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 0
From: No va
Default

on my CTSC on 5 psi non aftercooled i hit a 13.3@107 with a slipping clutch. only 285whp on a dynapack with a 2.0 60ft.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 09:47 AM
  #10  
RAIN H8R's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,757
Likes: 120
From: Waukesha, WI
Default

camuman, where in florida do you live? im towing my car down there in november..maybe we can goto the track together...
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:00 PM.