S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

AP1 Comptech SC dyno

Old Jul 30, 2005 | 06:25 PM
  #1  
FF2Skip's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 48,203
Likes: 10
From: Lewisville, TX
Default AP1 Comptech SC dyno

Comptech supercharger w/ aftercooler
3.25" ASP aluminum pulley
RC 750cc injectors
AEM EMS
AEM fpr
Comptech header
T1R testpipe
Invidia
ACT PP
Comptech flywheel
4.57's

Tuning was done by Custom Car Care in Newport News, VA. It was only in the 100's and about 75% humidity this past week. The numbers are corrected, but I can't wait to find a cool, dry night.

I think there is room for improvement actually. They said the car did not like VTEC engagement too low. Maybe something can be done about that. Rev limiter was set to 9400 rpm. Max boost read 12.8psi on their Dynapack. I arrived late and didn't think to ask about A/F. I had told them that I wanted it to be between 12.0 and 12.5:1. I'll be calling Monday morning to get the scoop and the fuel pressure at the rail.

Look, laugh, and constructive criticism please.

Reply
Old Jul 30, 2005 | 06:28 PM
  #2  
C6400hp's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,459
Likes: 0
From: North Texas
Default

Is that RWHP or FWHP?
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2005 | 06:32 PM
  #3  
FF2Skip's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 48,203
Likes: 10
From: Lewisville, TX
Default

Originally Posted by candyass,Jul 30 2005, 09:28 PM
Is that RWHP or FWHP?
Dynapacks generally read higher because they remove the wheels and record at the hub. Dynojets are on drums. Mustangs tend to read the lowest.

It's not really flywheel, but it's not "to the pavement." Wheel size/weights will affect that.

BTW, that airborn avatar is ok, but the car looks "off." Let me find an airborn pic that has the car perfectly balanced and in its lane.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2005 | 07:17 PM
  #4  
Slows2k's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 45,367
Likes: 428
From: Mother F'in TN
Default

I bet it's a blast to drive

I'd definitely get a AF graph
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2005 | 08:03 PM
  #5  
Liemoanh's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,806
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

You gained 50 rwhp between 8,000-9,300 rpms.

So I figured you went with the titanium retainers?

Nice job.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2005 | 09:21 PM
  #6  
FF2Skip's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 48,203
Likes: 10
From: Lewisville, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Liemoanh,Jul 30 2005, 11:03 PM
You gained 50 rwhp between 8,000-9,300 rpms.

So I figured you went with the titanium retainers?

Nice job.
Not yet.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2005 | 09:26 PM
  #7  
FF2Skip's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 48,203
Likes: 10
From: Lewisville, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Slows2k,Jul 30 2005, 10:17 PM
I'd definitely get a AF graph
BTW, I was reinstalling the carpet(don't ask!) and was considering foregoing the Frog harness and mounting in the stock ecu area vs. under/behind the seat. I jacked the car up to possibly reroute the wideband sensor to come through the firewall when I noticed they installed it in the testpipe(secondary). It appears to be approx. 16" from the primary. How much of a difference will that distance possibly make in the A/F reading? I do want it in the primary location in the event I need to reinstall the cat.



Oh, and on the way home, I never really got on it... kinda soggy weather and I was exhausted.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jul 30, 2005 | 11:13 PM
  #8  
Liemoanh's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,806
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by FF2Skip,Jul 30 2005, 09:21 PM
Not yet.
You got balls reving it to 9,350 rpms.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2005 | 02:35 PM
  #9  
FF2Skip's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 48,203
Likes: 10
From: Lewisville, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Liemoanh,Jul 31 2005, 02:13 AM
You got balls reving it to 9,350 rpms.
Yes, I have balls and two children to prove it!

But not because I upped the rev-limiter. Before doing so, I asked a ton of questions and have read even more.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2005 | 02:38 PM
  #10  
FF2Skip's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 48,203
Likes: 10
From: Lewisville, TX
Default

Originally Posted by mem4720,Jul 31 2005, 10:48 AM
Nice numbers! I suspect there is even more to be gained with better tuning. You may want to try the AEM intake temp-based timing compensation to pickup more power in cooler weather.

Can you post your map and datalogs online? Some of us have posted here:
http://forum.aempower.com/bbs/viewforum.php?f=72

I'm especially interested in ignition timing and boost vs. rpm.
I cannot. I don't have a laptop and am not going to lug the desktop out ot the garage nor drive it through the family room. But I just bought a laptop from an S owner in TN. When it arrives, I'll upload to the laptop and then to the net.

We(Black Nugget and I) did not use other people's maps to our knowledge. We just ended up giving the cars to the tuner.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BLanham
S2000 Forced Induction
22
Aug 10, 2012 12:10 PM
AusS2000
S2000 Forced Induction
26
Oct 31, 2009 02:48 PM
Sondra S2K
S2000 Forced Induction
29
Apr 17, 2008 10:24 PM
VegaS2k
S2000 Forced Induction
5
Sep 3, 2006 07:00 PM
mikecl713
S2000 Under The Hood
8
Jun 4, 2004 08:26 PM



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:27 PM.