Can you stomach another clutch thread?
It seems that puck discs are the norm for FI guys. They tend to grab harder than a street disc that has more surface area for slippage which is why I suggested the models I did. Didn't realize they slipped enough to cause crank walk...that sucks. Anybody know if ACT has fixed these issues?
There has been a thread about redesigned ACT HD disc. They reduced the clamping force in order to address concerns, but there has been some debate as to whether it was just ACT having the problem. Any clutch that puts to much force on the bearings can cause wear.
Originally Posted by silex,Jun 19 2009, 12:40 PM
It seems that puck discs are the norm for FI guys. They tend to grab harder than a street disc that has more surface area for slippage which is why I suggested the models I did. Didn't realize they slipped enough to cause crank walk...that sucks. Anybody know if ACT has fixed these issues?
Originally Posted by stitos2k,Jun 19 2009, 03:22 PM
Your clutch slipping doesn't cause crank walk 

Until ACT made changes in their clutch design they had the most release force of any aftermarket clutch manufacturer for the S2000. They now have 25% less release force which should put them at or slightly above the other clutch makers and most likely in a safe zone for end users.
Only ACT and Clutchmasters use the OEM style FOUR spring hubs which are generally less noisy or not noisy at all compared to Spec, Competition etc who use a SIX spring proprietary hub which tends to be noisy on the S2000 due to a difference in operational harmonics.
Aftermarket clutch makers rate their clutches according to flywheel torque not rear wheel torque. Rear wheel torque = .85 X flywheel torque. If you're looking to hold 225 rwtq you'll need a clutch rated at at least 265 fwtq plus a 20% service factor = 331 fwtq which is not hard to come by.
In all cases disableing the clutch safety switch is a MUST DO to maximum thrust washer life. This allows you to start the car without putting any force on the thrust washers when they are not yet lubricated.
Originally Posted by vader1,Jun 17 2009, 01:39 PM
And one final question:
What is the stock clutch supposedly rated for as far as power and torque are concerned?
What is the stock clutch supposedly rated for as far as power and torque are concerned?
Using that, we can get a conservative envelope:
HP = (TQ * RPM) / 5250 //// TQ = 5250 * HP / RPM
MIN = 310whp @ 8600RPM = 190 ft-lbs = Factory clutch OK
MAX = 360whp @ 8000RPM = 235 ft-lbs = Factory clutch slips
So around 210 ft-lbs of torque is where the factory clutch starts to lose grip.
__________
Also, has anyone on the board used Centerforce products on their S2000? I had one of their clutches on my old Dodge Stealth.
I believe the competition stage II clutch has been recently redesigned to reduce most, if not all clutch buzz and noise...you might want to contact them about it. Also, it is full face which means it should last longer than puck.
Originally Posted by vader1,Jun 19 2009, 02:53 PM
There has been a thread about redesigned ACT HD disc. They reduced the clamping force in order to address concerns, but there has been some debate as to whether it was just ACT having the problem. Any clutch that puts to much force on the bearings can cause wear.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
S2K@PR
S2000 Modifications and Parts
17
Jan 25, 2012 11:31 AM











