S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Custom Turbo Kit

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 24, 2005 | 09:47 PM
  #11  
papa5murf's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 43,083
Likes: 0
From: London, England
Default

inline has gone to either 26 or 28 psi.. with stock bottom
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2005 | 01:10 PM
  #12  
JayStyles662's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Default

Yeah S2kBoot thats would be cool...Because I am seriously considering it...But alot of people are telling me that supercharger would be best. They said its a drive in and drive out kind of thing....Another thing is that I don`t have the need for much HP I don`t streetrace all the time but every now and then I will run somebody.....Ontop of that my car is an everyday driver so I don` thave the time to tune it like I would want to...I was actually thinking of just buying the SC or TC kit and then just buying a second car....
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2005 | 02:07 PM
  #13  
thumpeyr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Andover
Default

Originally Posted by JayStyles662,Feb 25 2005, 04:10 PM
Yeah S2kBoot thats would be cool...Because I am seriously considering it...But alot of people are telling me that supercharger would be best. They said its a drive in and drive out kind of thing....Another thing is that I don`t have the need for much HP I don`t streetrace all the time but every now and then I will run somebody.....Ontop of that my car is an everyday driver so I don` thave the time to tune it like I would want to...I was actually thinking of just buying the SC or TC kit and then just buying a second car....
lol, yeah thats exactly what I did.. bought an 03 S2k put the UR turbo kit and got another car for a daily driver.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2005 | 06:47 PM
  #14  
JayStyles662's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Default

How do you like that kit? and what kinfd of tuing time am I looking at with a turbokit and how frequently will I have to tune?
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2005 | 06:38 AM
  #15  
JDMKID35's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,543
Likes: 0
From: BOWIE
Default

Originally Posted by azndrunkyoon,Feb 25 2005, 01:00 AM
30-35 psi. you've gone nuts. its that possible with all the tuning in the world. and not blowing your motor every 1000 miles. 22-24 psi soudns more like it to be at a max. does anyone run 35 psi yet? highest i heard of was the one from team alpha and cdafc.com

not bashing on you guys love fab. if kane was willing to go to you guys i think you guys can make a great kit. and i would rate it at the top for right now.
love fab
inlinepro
UR
Speedcraft(retired and died )

well untill i hear words from elda
I don't know if you know much about the f20c but the stock sleeves are twice as thick as a b series.. I have a sleeved block that that is rated up to 40 psi and 750 hp.... I have made over 500 hp on a stock motor so before you say it cant be done .. do some research and take a f20c apart and see how well built it is!!!!
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2005 | 09:18 AM
  #16  
thumpeyr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Andover
Default

Originally Posted by JayStyles662,Feb 25 2005, 09:47 PM
How do you like that kit? and what kinfd of tuing time am I looking at with a turbokit and how frequently will I have to tune?
I like the kit... Of course I upgraded the turbo to an ITS T3/T04E setup and ditched the emanage for an EMS in the beginning.

I was able to a little better numbers than the lovefab kit on the stock block with that setup. 328.5 rwhp @ 9psi. Not dissing the love fab kit, personally, I think thats a better deal than I got (a year ago) for simmilar numbers.

B.


Here is a vid of my dyno run last year on the stock motor

http://www.houseofbud.com/vids/S2kDynoRun.wmv
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2005 | 09:58 AM
  #17  
kane.s2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,372
Likes: 0
From: The Beach, CA
Default

thumpeyr, you did your run on a dynojet. Lovefab's was on a mustang dyno. There is about a 10-15% lower number that gets displayed on a mustang dyno compared to a dynojet. The lovefab kit is actually making at LEAST 350whp if you place it on a dynojet as well.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2005 | 10:00 AM
  #18  
kane.s2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,372
Likes: 0
From: The Beach, CA
Default

The reliability is all upto your tunning.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2005 | 01:45 PM
  #19  
thumpeyr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Andover
Default

Originally Posted by kane.s2k,Feb 26 2005, 12:58 PM
thumpeyr, you did your run on a dynojet. Lovefab's was on a mustang dyno. There is about a 10-15% lower number that gets displayed on a mustang dyno compared to a dynojet. The lovefab kit is actually making at LEAST 350whp if you place it on a dynojet as well.
Kane, your abolutely right... I forgot that small detail. Also one thing to think about. Chad ran this setup with no cat and no muffler. That alone is going to free up some ponies. My setup however did have a highflow cat and a single muffler.

Just some food for thought
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 01:59 AM
  #20  
ibleedhonda's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: san jose
Default

i think you need to rebuild your engine just for incase of emergency before you surpass over maybe 300whp. I too looking for good custom parts for turbo. To me the lovefab looks safe, I didnt say it's safe but it looks safe and so far my friend of mine never had problems yet.. and 350whp is already a good number. But i know how you feel jay and I too also want 400whp as a daily driven car and right now ill just day dream until this summer or winter
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:42 AM.