S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Dyno today

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 3, 2005 | 10:27 PM
  #21  
yellowknockers's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Default

Those are kick ass numbers!!! Congrats.

I'm hoping to bring you some friendly competition in the near future when Joe's finishes my motor build.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 12:08 AM
  #22  
BLOWNJROCK's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 0
From: 名古屋
Default

congrats!!!
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 04:52 AM
  #23  
Sub-Zero's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,896
Likes: 0
Default

390-440 eitherway, very impressive. Good job.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 06:29 AM
  #24  
Elistan's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,323
Likes: 28
From: Longmont, CO
Default

If we could see the entire dyno plot, it would most likely say "Correction Factor: 1.0" or some such. Every other dyno I've seen UL do says this. That means that NO correction factor, like the 1.2 that johninator talks about, has been applied.

Therefore, the 440hp that the Dynapack shows is dirrectly comparable to all the other dyno UL has done on his machine (barring any environmental issues like temp, humidity and condition of the machine.)

Of course, as others have pointed out this is not directly comparable to Dynojet or Mustand plots, due to the different nature in which the machines operate.

But still, these are very impressive numbers.

I'm rather amazed at the torque curve, however - it looks like the hp curve! Which suggests to me that the turbo never fully spools??? That is, torque (and therefore boost, I think?) is always increasing...
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 06:58 AM
  #25  
73Zero's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,078
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Default

Congrats Sideways! That's just AMAZING!
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 07:21 AM
  #26  
dave22's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,065
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Elistan,Mar 4 2005, 10:29 AM
I'm rather amazed at the torque curve, however - it looks like the hp curve! Which suggests to me that the turbo never fully spools??? That is, torque (and therefore boost, I think?) is always increasing...
It's a centrifugal supercharger. Boost is RPM-dependent
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 07:28 AM
  #27  
John_Z's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,479
Likes: 1
From: Vortech Central
Default

Now that's impressive! Nice job Phil.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 08:21 AM
  #28  
Elistan's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,323
Likes: 28
From: Longmont, CO
Default

Originally Posted by dave22,Mar 4 2005, 10:21 AM
It's a centrifugal supercharger. Boost is RPM-dependent
Doh! I was thinking it was a turbo. Duh.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 08:28 AM
  #29  
bobmoheb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
From: Alpharetta, GA
Default

Awesome job sideways. Also thanks for the pm earlier i sent you one back. What type of tires do you have. I am pushing 330 rwhp on a dynojet and i can't keep traction worth a damned on my 04
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 09:12 AM
  #30  
Sideways's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gold Member (Premium)
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,033
Likes: 21
From: South of the pier, Huntington Beach, CA
Default

Originally Posted by bobmoheb,Mar 4 2005, 09:28 AM
Awesome job sideways. Also thanks for the pm earlier i sent you one back. What type of tires do you have. I am pushing 330 rwhp on a dynojet and i can't keep traction worth a damned on my 04
Currently shaved RA-1s, 225/245 in 16. Marty has some 235/275s in 17 waiting for me.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:09 PM.