S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Experience with ATI or Fluidampr Harmonic dampener

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 3, 2018 | 11:20 PM
  #1  
Ek_Jak's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Default Experience with ATI or Fluidampr Harmonic dampener

Asking if anyone had any bad experiences with either ATI or Fluidampr Harmonic Dampeners? I like the fact that Fluidampr has one specifically made for the s2000 and can use the hex tool to remove unlike the ATI. But after searching around, seen more builders like Kings, inline pro, laskey, speedfactory all running ATI dampeners. Wanted to see what s2ki members have ran and hear their experiences. Thank you!
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2018 | 07:22 AM
  #2  
MarcusDubya77's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 356
Likes: 3
From: Schonaich, Germany
Default

I would be interested as well even though I am running N/A. Anything to tone down vibration.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2018 | 08:14 AM
  #3  
riceball777's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 75
From: Los angeles
Default

I have been running the Fluidampr for years with out issues.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2018 | 11:17 AM
  #4  
shrykhar's Avatar
Member (Premium)
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 385
Likes: 46
Default

Also been using the Fluidampr for almost a year with no issues. Vibrations have been noticeably reduced.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2018 | 11:35 AM
  #5  
Chibo's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 125
From: Scottsdale, Az
Default

This post reminded me of this...
ATI, Fluidampr and TCI Clear Up Damper Confusion - EngineLabs
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2018 | 12:09 PM
  #6  
THMotorsports's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,739
Likes: 29
From: Chicago
Default

We've used both, I've met with reps from both. Both are great products, but work on different concepts:

The ATI works on a similar concept as the OEM pulley. The OEM pulley uses a bonded rubber, the ATI uses internal elastomer. It can still wear out, but it can be rebuilt.

The Fluidampr is a viscous fluid - nothing to wear out - and it covers a broader range of harmonics.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2018 | 04:22 PM
  #7  
Mijae007's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 79
From: Los Angeles
Default

Im also on fluidamper. So far so good! Didnt really notice a difference. Then again my aftermarket motor mounts and exhaust created more vibration and noise so its hard to distinguish
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Apr 4, 2018 | 06:10 PM
  #8  
Charper732's Avatar
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 183
From: US129 Maryville, TN
Default

I've been searching for which damper is more effective at lower rpm. Like what every day street engines deal with. Logically thinking, wouldn't the ATI be more effective in the lower rpm range? It would seem the fluidamper would be more effective at higher rpm range as the damping effect would intensify as centrifugal force goes up
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2018 | 08:52 AM
  #9  
EOE's Avatar
EOE
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,589
Likes: 69
From: New England
Default

Originally Posted by Charper732
I've been searching for which damper is more effective at lower rpm. Like what every day street engines deal with. Logically thinking, wouldn't the ATI be more effective in the lower rpm range? It would seem the fluidamper would be more effective at higher rpm range as the damping effect would intensify as centrifugal force goes up
I googled purely out of interest and... the following link since to state the opposite:
Laskey Racing Online Store

I know nothing about these units though.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2018 | 09:45 AM
  #10  
shrykhar's Avatar
Member (Premium)
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 385
Likes: 46
Default

Originally Posted by Charper732
I've been searching for which damper is more effective at lower rpm. Like what every day street engines deal with. Logically thinking, wouldn't the ATI be more effective in the lower rpm range? It would seem the fluidamper would be more effective at higher rpm range as the damping effect would intensify as centrifugal force goes up
Mine seems to have lowered vibrations throughout the rev range - less vibes at idle, particularly. Other thing I've noticed is that clutch engagement seems smoother, maybe because of the damper's design or increased weight over stock, or maybe it's in my head.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:54 PM.