S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Experience with ATI or Fluidampr Harmonic dampener

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-05-2018, 11:34 AM
  #11  

 
riceball777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Los angeles
Posts: 3,116
Received 72 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Charper732
I've been searching for which damper is more effective at lower rpm. Like what every day street engines deal with. Logically thinking, wouldn't the ATI be more effective in the lower rpm range? It would seem the fluidamper would be more effective at higher rpm range as the damping effect would intensify as centrifugal force goes up
i have been running the fluidamper for years but to tell you the truth i never notice any difference compared to the oem crank pulley
Old 04-07-2018, 12:07 PM
  #12  

Thread Starter
 
Ek_Jak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 369
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sounds like Fluidampr it is, thanks for the replies!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
S2Krazee
Member S2000 Classifieds and For Sale
27
08-02-2010 09:28 AM
HankookS2K
Site Info
0
01-26-2009 11:20 AM
Huskergirl
Carolinas
2
06-16-2007 03:33 PM
E White
S2000 Under The Hood
16
12-31-2006 04:50 PM



Quick Reply: Experience with ATI or Fluidampr Harmonic dampener



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:34 PM.