S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

greddy guys post up

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 12, 2009 | 06:41 AM
  #1  
slidzhapply's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: alaska
Default greddy guys post up

I recently dyno'd my car and got it tuned...what was wierd was that on a baseline run it got 150rwhp, forgot the torque numbers....after a good tune it runs so much better but yet still relatively low numbers 233rwhp. I'm still running the EMU, pump gas, the cast log manifold, 70mm tp, and a 63mm dual exhaust.

My question is for the guys that got high numbers. What style manifold did you have and what engine management did you use, and possibly fuel.

I'm happy with the kit and very happy with the tune....jw if i was the only one that had low numbers on the kit..

thanks
dave
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2009 | 06:59 AM
  #2  
s2000isu's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Default

you had a low baseline too. Either your car is a turd or the dyno you used reads really really low.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2009 | 07:05 AM
  #3  
TopGear's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 9,557
Likes: 15
From: MD
Default

When you say baseline, you kind of sound like you're talking about the out of the box tune from greddy. Did you get a real baseline w/o the turbo on the car?
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2009 | 07:16 AM
  #4  
asukadc's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,248
Likes: 0
From: socal
Default

my sig, detail visit link
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2009 | 07:54 AM
  #5  
slidzhapply's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: alaska
Default

baseline as in the base map from greddy and the dyno that i was on reads maybe 5%-10% lower than a dyno jet.
i didn't get a run w/o turbo
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2009 | 08:17 AM
  #6  
s2000isu's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Default

that baseline was with the turbo?
thats 50 whp less than the average na s2000. Those are some horrible numbers I would like to see what a stock s2000 does on that dyno.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2009 | 08:21 AM
  #7  
slidzhapply's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: alaska
Default

from what i read and talked about with some people stock s2000's run 190ish...and yes those are horrible numbers, but the car runs well after the tune. good enough for a daily, but still a little dissapointed.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jul 12, 2009 | 08:24 AM
  #8  
camuman's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,044
Likes: 6
From: South Florida
Default

most likely, the tuner is not really good with emu. that would more then explain the low numbers. see mase, your in bradenton, so setup a time with mase in jax and get that thing hummin
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2009 | 08:37 AM
  #9  
slidzhapply's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: alaska
Default

mase did do the tune, it was a 90whp increase after he got done.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2009 | 08:42 AM
  #10  
camuman's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,044
Likes: 6
From: South Florida
Default

then that dyno just reads low and your fine. or your car was weaker then usual before the boost.


was this on a mustang dyno or dyno dynamics?

a 90 hp delta is pretty damn good. the problem with your number is its relative to the starting point. dyno dynamics are one of the lowest reading dynos. nm my first post, i think things are ok on it.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:47 AM.