S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Head Gaskets and Quench

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 7, 2009 | 11:31 AM
  #11  
camuman's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,044
Likes: 6
From: South Florida
Default

Originally Posted by siadam,Jul 7 2009, 03:06 PM
95% of the time I roll around on 300-350whp on my stock motor, however from time to time I turn it up to 500whp when I am out messing around.

Although I've only got ~600 miles on this setup since it was tuned in April...I just don't drive it all that much, mostly a weekend warrior...and even then it doesn't seen inclement weather.

funny u mention dirivng around on low boost, my buddy had a turbo vr6 and i put a ebc in it. so we had the 10psi spring, then low boost was 15, and hi boost was 20. was alot of fun. just turned the ebc off for daily driving on the spring. when a run came up turned it on and ran on 15psi, but if they were close, then push the hi boost button and run again
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2009 | 12:54 PM
  #12  
MADjdm's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
Default

Did anyone save/sticky the responses by Evans and TonyT1 regarding this topic when it was discussed a few months back?
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2009 | 01:06 PM
  #13  
AndyFloyd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,824
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MADjdm,Jul 7 2009, 12:54 PM
Did anyone save/sticky the responses by Evans and TonyT1 regarding this topic when it was discussed a few months back?
I didnt save it but, its the same stuff I already knew. Putting a thick HG basically reduces the engines quench zone and increases exhaust reversion which I believe hurts power. So a HG will allow for more boost, but with reduced efficiency while a stock HG limits boost on pumpgas but is much more efficient and will produce similar numbers.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2009 | 01:17 PM
  #14  
devs2k's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,852
Likes: 0
From: Clifton, NJ
Default

Evans:

I tune 90% of turbo s2000s with thicker headgaskets. This is what customers bring into my shop for tuning, not what I install. I feel more comfortable having the customer running lower compression on their engine while tuning for what its worth. The whole quench debate has been going on for awhile, and is something that as a degree'd ME engineer I can fully appreciate and agree with. With customers running log manifolds scavenging goes to crap, back pressure is high and ultimately the knock threshold is much lower compared to an equal length manifold.

On a side not, a really simple way to determine how well the exhaust manifold/exhaust flows is where the vtec engagement point is set. On a good manifold (FR, Lovefab, etc) I can have vtec engage as low as 4,000 rpm. With a log manifold vtec is usually between 6-7,000 rpm range.

Since the knock threshold is much lower on a log manifold, keeping the stock 11:1 compression is detrimental to making higher power on pump gas. Anything more than 11-12 psi range with a log on a decent size turbo (57/60 trim t3/t4, 3076r, gt3582r, etc) with 93 octane the car will start knocking. You can see it on the plugs, and see it out the exhaust if you know what to look for. Power output is usually around low 400whp range when this occurs, and timing is turned back ALOT in order to keep combustion stable. Same car with the thicker headgasket, can run 18-20 psi range and make another 100whp on the same octane.

Since the f-series and k-series engines are very similar, the knock thresholds are as well. Kpro has an excellent knock sensor threshold in the software for logging knock with the stock engine (i.e stock valvetrain, pistons, etc). Once forged pistons, or aftermarket valvetrain is installed the sensor tends to pick up ghost knock, or noise making the knock sensor read like its getting knock. I have tuned 200+ turbo k-series at this point with kpro. I have seen first hand how the stock 11:1 compression reacts to different turbo set-ups on 93 octane. Good turbo set-ups like FR kits are able to run more boost and timing before the knock sensor picks up knock count, and I confirm this by reading the plugs. Log manifold set-ups like Greddy kits, etc get knock count at much lower boost levels and run much less ignition advance. Backpressure and scavenging make all the difference in what you can get away with.

Getting back to the question at hand, if you are running a log manifold and want to make alot of power on pump gas get a thicker headgasket. If you are running an EL manifold with a efficient turbo set-up like the creator of this post you can get away with stock compression. I am by no means knocking Inline Pro or other log turbo kit companies. The kits are nice, fit well and certainly have a place on the market. People need to realize that there IS a big difference in how backpressure/scavenging plays a big role in knock threshold on a given fuel octane level. You can get away with ALOT in terms of boost/timing/compression when you are in the 1:1~1.5:1 ratio between intake/exhaust pressure levels.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2009 | 02:48 PM
  #15  
TRBOKEV's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
From: Phillips Ranch 909!
Default

Originally Posted by devs2k,Jul 7 2009, 01:17 PM
Evans:
Very informative. Thanks for posting this.

Seeing as how I will be running the ILP log manifold, I'm definitely going to go with the thicker head gasket. I just have a few options in thicknesses between 1.57mm and 2.28mm to pick. My car will also be ran on 91 octane and will be daily driven.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cujet
S2000 Forced Induction
18
Jan 31, 2016 01:42 PM
youngkilla
S2000 Forced Induction
5
Feb 1, 2015 02:33 PM
pettyboy69
Want to Buy
0
Jun 24, 2013 06:29 PM
mighty4g63
Upper Mid-West S2000 Owners
1
Apr 15, 2009 06:37 PM
xs2kboyx
S2000 Under The Hood
6
Dec 17, 2003 03:48 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:19 AM.