S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Individual Turbo's

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 11:21 PM
  #1  
chairmnofthboard's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 1
Default Individual Turbo's

Check this out.

Turbos

We were just talking about this the other day, add in some ITB's and you would have a wild looking set up.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 05:55 AM
  #2  
bullitt5897's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
From: ATL, Bitches
Default

thats freaking nuts!!!! I wanna see some data!!!
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 06:40 AM
  #3  
TelosHedge's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 1
From: LI, NY
Default

i've seen this before. more for fun than actual usage. imagine tuning that? what a nightmare!
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2008 | 09:26 AM
  #4  
snakeeater's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
From: Lafayette, LA
Default

I've often wondered how much more you could get out of the motor by tuning each cylinder individually. I know AEM EMS offer individual cylinder fuel trim, but that's just a fixed offset. The ideal cylinder offset may vary with rpm, load, etc. You might need separate air/fuel and timing maps for each cylinder to do any good. I guess that means 4 EMS's. Plus separate MAP, IAT, TPS, and wideband O2 sensors for each cylinder. And maybe even separate EGT thermocouples to be safe. I can see a 24 channel data logging setup. And years on the dyno. Man, it's getting pretty involved.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2008 | 09:45 AM
  #5  
passmans2kny's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,651
Likes: 0
From: huntington long island
Default

no way thats so awesome
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2008 | 07:41 PM
  #6  
SCCS2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 609
Likes: 1
From: LBC
Default

um...good luck with that.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2008 | 08:42 PM
  #7  
Stealth_SUX_'s Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 1
From: Modesto, CA
Default

It looks like it wont create enough boost in the long run.. like it may have no lag.. but will go down quickly..
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Aug 13, 2008 | 10:21 PM
  #8  
Artisan7471's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 825
Likes: 0
From: Reno Nevada
Default

One of those turbos would be perfect for my lawn mower!!
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 06:10 AM
  #9  
passmans2kny's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,651
Likes: 0
From: huntington long island
Default

yea woudlnt they all fall off after like 4000 rpms?
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 06:21 AM
  #10  
deathsled's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

that idea is ridiculous and won't work properly thats for sure. So each turbo is going to receive 1 exhaust pulse per crank revolution eh?

pulse, wait, wait, wait, pulse, wait, wait, wait, pulse, wait, wait, wait

yeah that sounds efficient.....

on our cars it might be able to start making boost at 9000rpm, but it wont be much boost and the charge will be hot as hell because I guarantee those tiny turbos are going to be overworked trying to keep up with airflow demand. It probably chokes off the engine rather than making power, haha

there's a reason this article is over 2 years old and we're not hearing much about it

there's also a reason why turbo setups usually go from twin turbo -> single turbo, its called efficiency.

that design, while cool looking, is full of fail
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:20 PM.