pwnd.

 

Hoa is not the kind of guy who is going to lie about anything. If he was misinformed then ok. Don't bash the guy for informaiton that nobody else on here can prove either.

 

there was one 2.5L that had close to 300 whp, but if i remember correctly it had over 13 compression.

 

Yeah, InlinePro's was 280whp. And 13:1 CR.

No one is bashing anyone. It's just that if someone says something like, "I know a couple people who..." then it is on them to back it up. Since I have an InlinePro stroker and actually track my car, I am in contact with Ya, John, and Jeremy frequently. That's not to say that others can't put together a 2.5L stroker, but that I haven't heard about any making over 280... which is a far cry from 320 whp.

 

40 WHP is huge especially on a NA car.

 

Why do I have to prove there aren't any close to 320 whp? I didn't state it. By that train of thought, I could claim I posted a lap of 2:10.456 on VIR's full course. Now you have to disprove it.


Anyway, I have an Inline stroker in my car with 4.57 gears. It is nasty for an NA car on the track. Once I get my suspension dialed in, it will be . As for comparing this setup with my previous sc'er build(eventually 398 whp on an east coast dyno) when it had only a 7lbs pulley(310whp), I'd have to say the "feel" at low rpm's(sub-6k) probably favors the stroker slightly, but in terms of fast, the sc'er wins.

 

Chris, O'Neil:

 

u are right the supercharger wins.
but u still can't get away from (force induction) = (FI)

the 2.5 are (Natural Aspirite)= (NA)
And do u know why most of those exotic cars sell so damn expensive?
it is because of thise super NA power.

 

they are expensive because of the name and the v12 that they carry under the hood. if we had v12, im sure we will kick so many ass

 

Funny quote of the day!