S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

InlinePro, NA 2.5L Better Than Turbo and SC

Thread Tools
 
Old May 31, 2007 | 03:45 PM
  #1  
fulken's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 106
Likes: 7
From: Nashville, TN
Default InlinePro, NA 2.5L Better Than Turbo and SC

I want 300WHP with good low end torque with SIMPLE, RELIABLE and CARB regal... (Not 600+ Dyno Queen)

I was waiting for root-type SC(BRP-StageOne-FlyingMiyata, FFW) or Axial SC. Both SC kit seems take forever to finish development.... Greddy turbo kit is there, but turbo is not simple as SC or NA(in long term).

Now InlinePro, NA 2.5L can make around 270WHP (possibly 300WHP?). Is InlinePro 2.5L NA better (simpler, more reliable, less expensive, and CARB regal) solution than BRP-SC or AF-SC?

What do I need to get reliable 300WHP with 2.5L NA? In other word, how much do I need to spend?

Here is Dyno chart from S2KI (not the latest)
Stage One Tuning (Posted: Apr 6 2007, 10:58 PM by WLAURENT)



InlinePro 2.5L NA (Posted: Sep 27 2006, 08:29 AM by ya@inlinepro
Reply
Old May 31, 2007 | 03:52 PM
  #2  
Soul Coughing's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,494
Likes: 71
From: Chiswick
Default

talk to ff2skip, i know he is running a 2.5l on the track. there is of course inlinepro too.
Reply
Old May 31, 2007 | 04:00 PM
  #3  
AusS2000's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,809
Likes: 15
From: Sydney
Default

LOL at "CARB regal".

That was a joke wasn't it?

I have to point out that the 263hp dyno from Inline would be a fully developed system. Wlaurent has only recently gone FI and I expect his 316.7 is very early numbers (and it's still 50hp more!!!!).

Added to that a 2.5L short block will set you back $5500 (is that core exchange or outright?) and involves work swapping the engine (lots of work!) and downtime.

There really isn't much comparison
Reply
Old May 31, 2007 | 04:03 PM
  #4  
kenyellows2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: alexandria
Default

Aus is right fi is still best bang for the buck, NA route is always more dollar per hps. Your best option right now is Greddy turbo kit, I dont how reliable but it is nearly CARB legal.
Reply
Old May 31, 2007 | 04:07 PM
  #5  
c_me_go's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,330
Likes: 13
From: Under the sun
Default

by looking at the dyno sheets.. looks like the na kinds flats out around 7.. but the turbo keeps going..
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 10:40 AM
  #6  
73Zero's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,078
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Default

From what I've seen, there's no way you're going to get a stroker F20C to pass smog. You'd more than likely just pass the visual inspection...but once your car is strapped to the dyno and have your emissions tested under a load, they'll FAIL you right on the spot. (In California, that's the way they perform smog tests nowadays...not sure about other states though.)
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 11:33 AM
  #7  
AROD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,452
Likes: 0
From: long island, new york
Default

go n/a, it takes less hp to be just as fast than fi
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 07:34 PM
  #8  
fulken's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 106
Likes: 7
From: Nashville, TN
Default

I live in Nashville TN. For smog test, they plug cable to ODBII at idle, this is all. In this situation, How much mod is ok? (sorry this could be too basic question)

I love NA stroker setup because it can look completely stock! It also has minimum parts that can fail. After enjoying good NA HP, if this is not enough, I can add inline turbo kit later for killer HP! If I buy Greddy turbo kit or BRP-SC kit first, I have to sell lot of used parts to install new parts...
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 09:37 PM
  #9  
FF2Skip's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 48,203
Likes: 10
From: Lewisville, TX
Default



Late night reading, and I came across this thread. You want straight power? Turbo. Don't waste your time with a sc'er. This comes from a guy who made 397 rwhp with a Comptech.

You want reliability? Leave the car alone. You're in the wrong forum(s).

That said, I have had zero problems thus far with my stroker. At the track, "You're not sc'ed?" is usually heard after the first session. Whether you go stroker or FI, an EMS is necessary. In our case out here, we have seasonal changes in the weather that necessitate different tunes.

Do I have to worry about belt tightening? No. Do I have the extra weight of the sc'er up front? No. Do I have that whine from a 3" pulley anymore? No.... and damn, I miss that!

Not sure why one cannot get a stroker to pass emissions? Between tune and the cat, what makes you think it won't pass? You can run an NA motor leaner than an FI one.

Oh well, there's my $.04. That's all I have left.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 03:23 PM
  #10  
fulken's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 106
Likes: 7
From: Nashville, TN
Default

FF2Skip,

What kind of compression are you running with your 2.5L NA? and why? InlinePro has few choices on their web.

How much do you re-gain by seasonal EMS re-tune? I though closed loop EMS can take care of seasonal weather effect... I used to work on 13:1 NA Datsun 510 with Webber but no experience with EMS tune...
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:19 AM.