S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

just got back from the dyno

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 21, 2012 | 06:11 PM
  #11  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by S2SEXY
Originally Posted by urBan_dK' timestamp='1345582234' post='21954169
Those are still pretty terrible numbers. You should be well over 350 WHP.
im sure you noticed its a dyno dynamics.im not sure there are any novi 1000's over 350 whp on that dyno.to get dynojet numbers you multiply with .85 so ive read.that puts me at 376.im seeing about 11psi
The Comptech Aftercooler would put you at or over 400whp Dynojet. You should be easily hitting 350whp on the Dynamics. The minimal cooling increase you get from the fmic is far lost from the 3-4psi boost loss you are getting with it.

I made 375whp Dynjet at 11psi as well, but I was running a 3.4" pulley and an After cooler. My blower was also straining less then yours is now and producing less IAT heat as a result. The game is all about maximizing efficiency with this blower wile keeping IAT in balanced levels. FMIC is not a good efficient option for a Supercharger, proven time and time again. Your also losing some roll on throttle response with an fmic compared to the more direct intake path of the after cooler.

You mentioned, adjusting the timing 1 degree, but you didn't say whether that was advanced or retarded? I am curious.

You may want to post up your dyno graph so we can see why you aren't continuing to make power past 8k, whether that is belt slip or you are reaching your efficiency threshold.

Sorry if it feels like I'm beating you up, I'm just trying to help and enlighten you and the community with my experience with this kit/system. I hate to hear of expensive mistakes or misunderstandings that prevent seeing the maximum performance out of the equipment.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2012 | 09:50 PM
  #12  
urBan_dK's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 1
From: Mill Creek, WA
Default

Originally Posted by S2SEXY
Originally Posted by urBan_dK' timestamp='1345582234' post='21954169
Those are still pretty terrible numbers. You should be well over 350 WHP.
im sure you noticed its a dyno dynamics.
Why would I notice that, it's not mentioned anywhere in this thread.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2012 | 02:43 AM
  #13  
S2SEXY's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,038
Likes: 0
Default

My timing was set at -6 from 8k-9k,changed it to -5 and it made more power,set it to -4 and it made the same power as -5.this is using a emanage.

Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2012 | 02:46 AM
  #14  
S2SEXY's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,038
Likes: 0
Default

Also when I ran the 3.2 I made 9.5psi and power did the same thing at 8500 it just leveled off.

Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2012 | 04:59 AM
  #15  
camuman's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,044
Likes: 6
From: South Florida
Default

that dyno dynamics prolly has zero x factor in it. thats why his numbers look so low. cant compare different dynos, and cant even compare one dyno dynamics to another cause of the potential hidden x factor. nice numbers regardless. the leveling off would conern me, but emanage is far from perfect solution, prolly tuning related more then anything. -5 implies to me your running 23ish degrees of timing up there at 11psi, which sounds like a lot to me. but whatever, if the car is solid and compression tests good, have at it. no doubt your car moves by the Et's you run thats for sure.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2012 | 06:30 AM
  #16  
S2SEXY's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,038
Likes: 0
Default

Yeah this fall I hope to run 11.99

Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2012 | 06:31 AM
  #17  
S2SEXY's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,038
Likes: 0
Default

I believe the timing is closer to 18.stock timing at 8300-9000 is about 23.

Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2012 | 06:35 AM
  #18  
S2SEXY's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,038
Likes: 0
Default

Urban my fault...lol

Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2012 | 06:52 AM
  #19  
camuman's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,044
Likes: 6
From: South Florida
Default

Originally Posted by S2SEXY
I believe the timing is closer to 18.stock timing at 8300-9000 is about 23.

Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2

use an ob2 scanner and log it, cause i believe timing is more 28ish stock up top.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2012 | 09:07 AM
  #20  
urBan_dK's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 1
From: Mill Creek, WA
Default

Originally Posted by camuman
Originally Posted by S2SEXY' timestamp='1345645890' post='21955723
I believe the timing is closer to 18.stock timing at 8300-9000 is about 23.

Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2

use an ob2 scanner and log it, cause i believe timing is more 28ish stock up top.
This is correct.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:28 AM.