S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

LoveFab in 2.2?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 22, 2005 | 03:51 PM
  #1  
S2000RO_JA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: jacksonville
Default LoveFab in 2.2?

any1 know of any1 that has TC a 2.2L or higher with the Lovefab turbo? Just curious on what major differences there would be if any
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2005 | 07:42 PM
  #2  
RZFD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
From: 8100 RPM
Default

I don't think anyone is yet. But I doubt there'd be any difference save for the base map.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2005 | 05:37 AM
  #3  
VeilsideAP1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Default

yeah, maybe the charge piping? I know the only big difference is the new crossmember right in front of the radiator... I think it would fit without much problem... it'd be fast... seems to be the only thing that makes that extra .2 worth it...
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2005 | 08:52 AM
  #4  
Tinker219's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 697
Likes: 1
From: Traverse City, Michigan
Default

10% more displacement should make 10% or more power over the 2.0. At least theoretically
2.2 + boost=

To anyone with a AP2 that wants a kit, Ill give them a free install if I can use their car to build an exhaust on!!!
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2005 | 09:31 AM
  #5  
S2000RO_JA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: jacksonville
Default

sweet...cuz i am gunning for an AP2 prolly a '04 and after doing hella loads of research i figured lovefab is for me....Tinker is 8 PSI this highest u guys recommend cuz i would like to see something along the lines of 11 or 12 PSI. What else would i have to do to get there with AP2...or can handle it as is?
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2005 | 10:54 AM
  #6  
CrazyPhuD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,759
Likes: 0
From: SF, California
Default

[QUOTE=Tinker219,Jul 23 2005, 09:52 AM] 10% more displacement should make 10% or more power over the 2.0. At least theoretically
2.2 + boost=
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2005 | 12:48 PM
  #7  
Tinker219's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 697
Likes: 1
From: Traverse City, Michigan
Default

I said power, not HP. But yes, torque moves the car, HP is a measure of torque over time(rpm).
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jul 27, 2005 | 09:01 PM
  #8  
S2000RO_JA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: jacksonville
Default

so will a 2.2L (or higher) be better to turbo? cuz if im not an ididot i heard that 2.2 is sorry for turboing cuz it gets to only 8.6k?rpm and that makes it sorrier bcuz????
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2005 | 05:28 AM
  #9  
Tinker219's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 697
Likes: 1
From: Traverse City, Michigan
Default

Id rather have the 2.2 for boost, simple as that. If you ever sleeve the motor, you may be able to get up to 2.4 liters by boring the cylinders out a wee-bit(not sure, havent looked into it, just referencing B series motors to the .2 increase).
By the time the F20C is hitting its fancy 9k rpm redline, the F22C is far ahead, everything else being equal, because the extra torque or "power"
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2005 | 08:26 AM
  #10  
kane.s2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,372
Likes: 0
From: The Beach, CA
Default

and it'll spool up faster. Who doesn't want that?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:00 PM.