S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

LoveFab in 2.2?

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-22-2005, 03:51 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
S2000RO_JA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: jacksonville
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default LoveFab in 2.2?

any1 know of any1 that has TC a 2.2L or higher with the Lovefab turbo? Just curious on what major differences there would be if any
Old 07-22-2005, 07:42 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
RZFD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 8100 RPM
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't think anyone is yet. But I doubt there'd be any difference save for the base map.
Old 07-23-2005, 05:37 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
VeilsideAP1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yeah, maybe the charge piping? I know the only big difference is the new crossmember right in front of the radiator... I think it would fit without much problem... it'd be fast... seems to be the only thing that makes that extra .2 worth it...
Old 07-23-2005, 08:52 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Tinker219's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Traverse City, Michigan
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

10% more displacement should make 10% or more power over the 2.0. At least theoretically
2.2 + boost=

To anyone with a AP2 that wants a kit, Ill give them a free install if I can use their car to build an exhaust on!!!
Old 07-27-2005, 09:31 AM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
S2000RO_JA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: jacksonville
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

sweet...cuz i am gunning for an AP2 prolly a '04 and after doing hella loads of research i figured lovefab is for me....Tinker is 8 PSI this highest u guys recommend cuz i would like to see something along the lines of 11 or 12 PSI. What else would i have to do to get there with AP2...or can handle it as is?
Old 07-27-2005, 10:54 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
CrazyPhuD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SF, California
Posts: 3,759
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Tinker219,Jul 23 2005, 09:52 AM] 10% more displacement should make 10% or more power over the 2.0. At least theoretically
2.2 + boost=
Old 07-27-2005, 12:48 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Tinker219's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Traverse City, Michigan
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I said power, not HP. But yes, torque moves the car, HP is a measure of torque over time(rpm).
Old 07-27-2005, 09:01 PM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
S2000RO_JA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: jacksonville
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so will a 2.2L (or higher) be better to turbo? cuz if im not an ididot i heard that 2.2 is sorry for turboing cuz it gets to only 8.6k?rpm and that makes it sorrier bcuz????
Old 07-28-2005, 05:28 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
Tinker219's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Traverse City, Michigan
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Id rather have the 2.2 for boost, simple as that. If you ever sleeve the motor, you may be able to get up to 2.4 liters by boring the cylinders out a wee-bit(not sure, havent looked into it, just referencing B series motors to the .2 increase).
By the time the F20C is hitting its fancy 9k rpm redline, the F22C is far ahead, everything else being equal, because the extra torque or "power"
Old 07-28-2005, 08:26 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
kane.s2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Beach, CA
Posts: 5,372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

and it'll spool up faster. Who doesn't want that?


Quick Reply: LoveFab in 2.2?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:11 PM.