S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

My Turbo S2000 Monster

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 1, 2007 | 09:53 AM
  #121  
slimjim8201's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: Gie
Default

Originally Posted by Spoolin,Mar 1 2007, 12:32 PM
Get that exhaust opened up and say hello to an extra 50-75 whp.
In due time... muhahaha.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 08:41 PM
  #122  
slimjim8201's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: Gie
Default

Video
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 01:32 AM
  #123  
nsxs2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: Nakano-JPN, Sydney, SOCAL
Default

Congratulations!

I wish InlinePro is in California, I would drop off my S2K tomorrow, maybe I should ship the car to them and get everything installed.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2007 | 05:42 PM
  #124  
Mr. Kim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by slimjim8201,Mar 2 2007, 09:41 PM
What gear were you in when you reached the top spead in the video?

Any idea what your 0-60mph and 0-100mph are at now?

Awesome car
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2007 | 05:51 PM
  #125  
slimjim8201's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: Gie
Default

Originally Posted by Mr. Kim,Mar 5 2007, 09:42 PM
What gear were you in when you reached the top spead in the video?

Any idea what your 0-60mph and 0-100mph are at now?

Awesome car
Gears 4, 5 and 6 were used in the video. The max speed in the video was achieved in 6th. As you can tell by the acceleration at 152 MPH, when I reach it, I will positively bounce off of the rev limiter in 6th gear.

It's hard to say estimate 0-60 and 0-100 numbers. If I had wider tires for traction, I'd assume a 4 second (or less) 0-60 time and a 0-100 time of less than 10 seconds.

The power to weight ratio is positively sickening.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 07:48 AM
  #126  
jakub2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,976
Likes: 1
From: Slovakian living in Dubai
Default

Welcome in the 400+ club and get used to the power. Drive safe
Reply
Old May 2, 2007 | 12:47 PM
  #127  
plokivos's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 2
From: atlanta
Default

wait, at 19psi, you should be well over 400whp?

we have a car here at 13psi with the same setup running 390whp...


i just saw the video. Dyno dynamic = heart breaker.


I got your burn out take off video with 2stepping. that's cool.
Reply
Old May 2, 2007 | 12:58 PM
  #128  
Jekyoo_Style's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,457
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by plokivos,May 2 2007, 02:47 PM
wait, at 19psi, you should be well over 400whp?

we have a car here at 13psi with the same setup running 390whp...


i just saw the video. Dyno dynamic = heart breaker.


I got your burn out take off video with 2stepping. that's cool.
the car that's making 390rwhp @ 13psi is most likely running a tubular manifold instead of a log.
Reply
Old May 2, 2007 | 01:52 PM
  #129  
RacerXI's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,650
Likes: 20
From: Dothan, AL
Default

Originally Posted by Jekyoo_Style,May 2 2007, 02:58 PM
the car that's making 390rwhp @ 13psi is most likely running a tubular manifold instead of a log.
and a different turbo/housing.
Reply
Old May 2, 2007 | 01:53 PM
  #130  
slimjim8201's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: Gie
Default

Originally Posted by plokivos
wait, at 19psi, you should be well over 400whp?
Not with this turbo and this exhaust.

Originally Posted by plokivos
we have a car here at 13psi with the same setup running 390whp...
No we don't. If the car had the same setup, it would be making the same power at the same boost level.

[QUOTE=plokivos]i just saw the video.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:06 AM.