S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

New supercharger kit

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 03:33 PM
  #11  
Dsgs2k3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,263
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
Default

is this not the same thing as a centrifugal supercharger, what is the difference
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 03:38 PM
  #12  
Jimbo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
From: Almaden Valley, CA
Default

Pretty funny to see this considering JR has continued to say for years that the S2000 volume did not justify a kit. I think they finally realized that there may be fewer S2000s than Integras and Civics, but the owners actually have disposable income and don't live with mommy and daddy anymore
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 03:44 PM
  #13  
IheartS2ks's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Dsgs2k3,Oct 31 2006, 04:33 PM
is this not the same thing as a centrifugal supercharger, what is the difference
Apparently its "the best of both worlds". You get low end power and instant throttle response (like a roots) from the "rollers" inside the compressor. And you get high end power, all the way to redline, just like a centrifugal.

I still don't know exactly how it works, but I know it is supposed to be lubricated be some sort of "special" oil and doesn't produce that much heat. I haven't seen a "aftercooler" or intercooler anywhere on the manufacturer's site.

I think the "rollers" inside the compressor act as a mini-roots blower and keep spinning at the same speed at lower RPMs to produce the lower end torque, but I really have no clue.

I'm looking forward to it, but I'm not holding my breath. I'm sure it will find some way to fall through the cracks.
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 04:22 PM
  #14  
Dsgs2k3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,263
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
Default

just seems exactly like a centrifugal SC because of the way it runs off a belt to a pulley which spins the impeller and sucks air. dont see how it would create low end torque since there is no way to have it spool up like a turbo since it is being ran off of the engine. correct me if i am wrong
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 04:51 PM
  #15  
Slows2k's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 45,374
Likes: 429
From: Mother F'in TN
Default

The Rotrex uses a planetary gear to step up the impeller speeds. They can get a higher impeller speed with a lower input shaft speed when compared to a traditional gear or ball driven centrifugal.

I'd rock one

Check out Wheel to Wheel, who does work for GM. They have done some very High powered LS1-LS7's with Rotrex units.

http://www.w2wpowertrain.com/t-about-2.aspx
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 04:53 PM
  #16  
Slows2k's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 45,374
Likes: 429
From: Mother F'in TN
Default

http://www.w2wpowertrain.com/t-novabuild-2.aspx
The sleeper Nova they built is a $$ taker
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 05:11 PM
  #17  
WLAURENT's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 1
From: Mesa
Default

Perhaps since they started using the new SC they found they could get the performance and drivability they wanted at a cost they could market as a true bolt-on kit. Or the used S2000 market has put enough cars into the hands of the their target audience.

I never went with a centrifugal because it was lacking on the bottom end (ok my personal opinion) and turbo just seems like to much work and $$$. I have had JRSC's on a GSR and an ITR and loved them - great power and no problems from a company with excellent customer service.

Bet this kit will install easier than a Comptech and go like hell.


Old Oct 31, 2006 | 06:36 PM
  #18  
trivium's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,723
Likes: 0
Default

I called and the guy said on Monday there will be more info Since Oscar is at Sema.
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 06:38 PM
  #19  
CourageOO7's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,170
Likes: 0
From: SLC, UT
Default

Originally Posted by WLAURENT,Oct 31 2006, 09:11 PM
Perhaps since they started using the new SC they found they could get the performance and drivability they wanted at a cost they could market as a true bolt-on kit. Or the used S2000 market has put enough cars into the hands of the their target audience.

I never went with a centrifugal because it was lacking on the bottom end (ok my personal opinion) and turbo just seems like to much work and $$$. I have had JRSC's on a GSR and an ITR and loved them - great power and no problems from a company with excellent customer service.

Bet this kit will install easier than a Comptech and go like hell.
It's not personal opinion...I'm a Comptech guy and I admit there's no bottom end power. However, I doubt you're going to find an easier install for an FI setup. Sorry.
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 06:40 PM
  #20  
4bang6's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 3
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Jimbo,Oct 31 2006, 04:38 PM
Pretty funny to see this considering JR has continued to say for years that the S2000 volume did not justify a kit. I think they finally realized that there may be fewer S2000s than Integras and Civics, but the owners actually have disposable income and don't live with mommy and daddy anymore



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:21 PM.