No expense spared Build + CD009 = UglyStick V2
10-19-2017, 05:40 PM
#21
So, you're saying I didn't make 741whp on two 255's at 29.6 psi on e85 and the extra 4.4 psi didn't get me to 800 whp? On the most accurate chasis dyno out there that can't be manipulated? Dynojet's don't lie man.
When I get to 900 whp on two Aeromotive 340's, I'll be sure to post up.
When I get to 900 whp on two Aeromotive 340's, I'll be sure to post up.
Just for entertainment sake, do you have anything other than dyno numbers that would give a rough idea of your car's performance? 1/4 times? 1/2 times? Anything?
10-20-2017, 06:23 AM
#23
What is the deal here?
https://www.s2ki.com/forums/s2000-fo...0-whp-1170643/
In March you were aware two Walbro 450's made way more sense than the two 340's, but now you disagree? You already saw proof someone maxed out two 450's at 923whp and those flow more than the 340's by a large margin at the pressures we are talking about.
If you are still wanting to do a badass fuel pump setup our ID Brushless Pump isn't that far out. Wait for it.
https://www.s2ki.com/forums/s2000-fo...0-whp-1170643/
In March you were aware two Walbro 450's made way more sense than the two 340's, but now you disagree? You already saw proof someone maxed out two 450's at 923whp and those flow more than the 340's by a large margin at the pressures we are talking about.
If you are still wanting to do a badass fuel pump setup our ID Brushless Pump isn't that far out. Wait for it.
Last edited by hatrickstu; 10-20-2017 at 06:28 AM.
10-20-2017, 12:53 PM
#24
I think it doesn't make sense, but I have no way to disprove what a dyno told you. I do find it amazing you don't have an answer for any of the flow related questions I have asked you, which can easily be proven as true or false. I am just trying to bring some data into this discussion so someone doesn't throw a set of injectors in their car along with a fuel pump setup that isn't even close to large enough. Why anyone would build a car at the very edge of the fuel pumps or fuel injectors is beyond me, but there are those people out there...
Just for entertainment sake, do you have anything other than dyno numbers that would give a rough idea of your car's performance? 1/4 times? 1/2 times? Anything?
Just for entertainment sake, do you have anything other than dyno numbers that would give a rough idea of your car's performance? 1/4 times? 1/2 times? Anything?
My car is a street car but possibly soon to be a 1/2 mile car if I choose to go that route. The only data I have from before my new build that is under way is dynojet numbers and possibly 60-130 mph numbers that I would have to get from my tuner.
10-20-2017, 12:54 PM
#25
Instead of asking me those questions that you seem to already know, why don't you just explain it to everyone.
My car is a street car but possibly soon to be a 1/2 mile car if I choose to go that route. The only data I have from before my new build that is under way is dynojet numbers and possibly 60-130 mph numbers that I would have to get from my tuner.
My car is a street car but possibly soon to be a 1/2 mile car if I choose to go that route. The only data I have from before my new build that is under way is dynojet numbers and possibly 60-130 mph numbers that I would have to get from my tuner.
If you want to share your 60-130 times that will be a really great indication of how much power it was making.
11-15-2017, 02:13 PM
#26
Damn, i havent been back in here in a while. Per the fuel pump argument going on, i think you two have to realize your going off of different dyno's, stu a mainline that reads like mustang and spoolin a DJ. im positive my car was nearing if not over 800 DJ with plenty of fuel on the 340's before i broke the axle, but since i just want to see this project complete, i opted to just swap to 2 450's anyway and stick to the goal of maxing the turbo. base map was done the other day so that JW can calibrate the speedometer fix, and then the 450's go in, and then it heads off to finish tuning. as for dyno #'s, id like to replicate neema's results, but its not likely on the inefficient design i have, so i would be happy with 850 all in, anything over is just icing. and this is based off the dyno i did 730@27psi for reference.
The following users liked this post:
Spoolin (11-15-2017)
12-07-2017, 05:11 PM
#29
Like the cutout, may do this on mine. BTW, is that the O2 sensor by the trans? Seems too far away from the turbo and heard that you should stay within 16 inches of the turbine outlet.
12-09-2017, 07:26 AM
#30
No idea on 02 sensor placement, been the same place since ive had the car. if it is past 16", it cant be by much
The following users liked this post:
Spoolin (12-09-2017)