S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

No expense spared Build + CD009 = UglyStick V2

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 19, 2017 | 05:40 PM
  #21  
hatrickstu's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 62
Default

Originally Posted by Spoolin
So, you're saying I didn't make 741whp on two 255's at 29.6 psi on e85 and the extra 4.4 psi didn't get me to 800 whp? On the most accurate chasis dyno out there that can't be manipulated? Dynojet's don't lie man.

When I get to 900 whp on two Aeromotive 340's, I'll be sure to post up.
I think it doesn't make sense, but I have no way to disprove what a dyno told you. I do find it amazing you don't have an answer for any of the flow related questions I have asked you, which can easily be proven as true or false. I am just trying to bring some data into this discussion so someone doesn't throw a set of injectors in their car along with a fuel pump setup that isn't even close to large enough. Why anyone would build a car at the very edge of the fuel pumps or fuel injectors is beyond me, but there are those people out there...

Just for entertainment sake, do you have anything other than dyno numbers that would give a rough idea of your car's performance? 1/4 times? 1/2 times? Anything?
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2017 | 05:40 AM
  #22  
gsx2004's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: Weston, FL
Default

Reply
Old Oct 20, 2017 | 06:23 AM
  #23  
hatrickstu's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 62
Default

What is the deal here?

https://www.s2ki.com/forums/s2000-fo...0-whp-1170643/

In March you were aware two Walbro 450's made way more sense than the two 340's, but now you disagree? You already saw proof someone maxed out two 450's at 923whp and those flow more than the 340's by a large margin at the pressures we are talking about.

If you are still wanting to do a badass fuel pump setup our ID Brushless Pump isn't that far out. Wait for it.

Last edited by hatrickstu; Oct 20, 2017 at 06:28 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2017 | 12:53 PM
  #24  
Spoolin's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,507
Likes: 51
From: Sellersburg, IN
Default

Originally Posted by hatrickstu
I think it doesn't make sense, but I have no way to disprove what a dyno told you. I do find it amazing you don't have an answer for any of the flow related questions I have asked you, which can easily be proven as true or false. I am just trying to bring some data into this discussion so someone doesn't throw a set of injectors in their car along with a fuel pump setup that isn't even close to large enough. Why anyone would build a car at the very edge of the fuel pumps or fuel injectors is beyond me, but there are those people out there...

Just for entertainment sake, do you have anything other than dyno numbers that would give a rough idea of your car's performance? 1/4 times? 1/2 times? Anything?
Instead of asking me those questions that you seem to already know, why don't you just explain it to everyone.

My car is a street car but possibly soon to be a 1/2 mile car if I choose to go that route. The only data I have from before my new build that is under way is dynojet numbers and possibly 60-130 mph numbers that I would have to get from my tuner.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2017 | 12:54 PM
  #25  
hatrickstu's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 62
Default

Originally Posted by Spoolin
Instead of asking me those questions that you seem to already know, why don't you just explain it to everyone.

My car is a street car but possibly soon to be a 1/2 mile car if I choose to go that route. The only data I have from before my new build that is under way is dynojet numbers and possibly 60-130 mph numbers that I would have to get from my tuner.
I have already tried to explain it, but you kept arguing lol.

If you want to share your 60-130 times that will be a really great indication of how much power it was making.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2017 | 02:13 PM
  #26  
LostMarine's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 342
Likes: 16
Default

Damn, i havent been back in here in a while. Per the fuel pump argument going on, i think you two have to realize your going off of different dyno's, stu a mainline that reads like mustang and spoolin a DJ. im positive my car was nearing if not over 800 DJ with plenty of fuel on the 340's before i broke the axle, but since i just want to see this project complete, i opted to just swap to 2 450's anyway and stick to the goal of maxing the turbo. base map was done the other day so that JW can calibrate the speedometer fix, and then the 450's go in, and then it heads off to finish tuning. as for dyno #'s, id like to replicate neema's results, but its not likely on the inefficient design i have, so i would be happy with 850 all in, anything over is just icing. and this is based off the dyno i did 730@27psi for reference.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2017 | 09:05 AM
  #27  
5thgen's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 460
Likes: 90
Default

How do you like the 350z transmission? Did you end up using a twin disc?

I wonder if a 350z 6-puck engages as bad as the S2000 6-pucks seem too.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2017 | 07:51 AM
  #28  
LostMarine's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 342
Likes: 16
Default

Got the Speedo calibrated with the CD009 swap




Cut out to let the baby breathe a bit better




Tuning at IMW tomorrow
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2017 | 05:11 PM
  #29  
Spoolin's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,507
Likes: 51
From: Sellersburg, IN
Default

Like the cutout, may do this on mine. BTW, is that the O2 sensor by the trans? Seems too far away from the turbo and heard that you should stay within 16 inches of the turbine outlet.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2017 | 07:26 AM
  #30  
LostMarine's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 342
Likes: 16
Default

Originally Posted by Spoolin
Like the cutout, may do this on mine. BTW, is that the O2 sensor by the trans? Seems too far away from the turbo and heard that you should stay within 16 inches of the turbine outlet.
cutout was worth 40rwhp at 30psi and up. The question though, is given that the exhaust is too small anyway, did adding the cutout create a restriction when closed, or did adding the cutout free hp when open..

No idea on 02 sensor placement, been the same place since ive had the car. if it is past 16", it cant be by much
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:29 PM.