everything looks sick but inline pros manifold is the only thing im not feeling, a stainless manifold with a true merge collector will make a turbo kit that much better, otherwise inline pros kit looks very good

 

thats not where i have my air pump installed, if you can see i still have stuff everywhere cuz i was still in the installation process

 

Well a stainless tubular from what I've been hearing is prone to cracking. The length of the runners seems to be in between that of a log and off an equal length. I do have a good shop that can weld me an equal length for a decent price. I was just afraid that stainless would crack.

 

I think the benefits of a tubular turbo manifold, while measurable (more so the higher the power being made), are blown waaaaaaayyyy out of proportion compared to log-style manifolds.

 

inline pro's log manifold is one of the best on the markets. Maybe not superior to a tubular but the manifold isn't a horrible manifold. There is still power to be made. Whats the difference between making 400whp with a log and 400whp with a tubular??

 

PSI?!

 

wheres the proof of this??? I havn't seen any turbular numbers that made me be like .
Besides my boy arnold, but thats a different story.

 

btw, a log & tubular can both be equal length.

Tubular cracks if the walls are too thin, shotty welds, not enough proper bracing of the pieces, and also extreme high heat from a badly tuned engine or more than what the car should be doing.

 

whats with the ??

i never said a log and tubular cudn't both be equal length. I dn't mean to be an a$$ or anything i just dn't understand why people talk soo badly on log manifolds and worship tubular??? I dn't know the answer myself so i'm lookin for someone to break this all down for me

 

Im not talking bad, but I did make 313 whp on 5.5-6 psi with a tubular mani similar to lovefabs GT1.

This thread shows what is what on manifolds.

http://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1220067