S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

School me on intercooler piping!

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 22, 2010 | 08:38 PM
  #11  
Spoolin's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,507
Likes: 51
From: Sellersburg, IN
Default

I am making over 700 whp with my 2.5" piping with zero issues.

Also, I dont think the bends will make any difference as long as they are smooth bends and with no kinks. The air has to go somewhere anyway and the path of least resistance in this situation really doesnt matter IMO. It would be a good idea to keep the lengths down for response though.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2010 | 08:06 AM
  #12  
siadam's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,791
Likes: 1
From: Around
Default

Originally Posted by Spoolin,Oct 22 2010, 08:38 PM
I am making over 700 whp with my 2.5" piping with zero issues.

Also, I dont think the bends will make any difference as long as they are smooth bends and with no kinks. The air has to go somewhere anyway and the path of least resistance in this situation really doesnt matter IMO. It would be a good idea to keep the lengths down for response though.
Of course you won't have issues, thats not what I'm saying, you can make the power easier on bigger piping above a certain level/psi.

No difference when you start to have a restriction with exhaust gases at a certain diameter piping, and you upgrade, same thing applies to i/c piping.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2010 | 09:21 AM
  #13  
vtfo0lio's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Default

I had a 3' on a different car and wish I wouldn't picked 2.5. Unless you are going for the moon, I don't think it's worth it. I think things like intake manifolds and 3' IC piping are only good for 650whp and above. You just lose response for top end power. One thing is nuts though is that when you blow off the piping, it'll sound like a damn shotgun blast just went off under your hood!
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2010 | 10:19 AM
  #14  
m R g S r's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,507
Likes: 0
From: Westchester NY
Default

If you use 3" keep the piping as smooth and short as possible. dont route it in some retarded manner.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2010 | 01:54 PM
  #15  
Spoolin's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,507
Likes: 51
From: Sellersburg, IN
Default

Originally Posted by siadam,Oct 23 2010, 11:06 AM
Of course you won't have issues, thats not what I'm saying, you can make the power easier on bigger piping above a certain level/psi.

No difference when you start to have a restriction with exhaust gases at a certain diameter piping, and you upgrade, same thing applies to i/c piping.
Exhaust gases and cool air charge are 2 totally different animals. Exhaust gases, being extremely hot, need larger tubing to flow large amounts of air through because of the expanded molecules of air from the heat. Cool charge air reacts just the opposite. The cool charge air doesnt need as large of tubing to flow large amounts of air because the molecules are contracted. To a point you are correct in saying that you will eventually need to go larger with the charge piping, but from my experience in seeing dyno runs between 2.5" charge piping and 3" charge piping on a 800 whp EVO, the difference in size of charge piping didnt change a thing. I would assume that when you start to exceed around 800 whp, you may want to upgrade to 3" charge piping, but until then, you should be just fine.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AlexSobe614
S2000 Forced Induction
7
Jul 27, 2016 08:46 PM
liquidgsr
S2000 Forced Induction
13
Aug 29, 2012 02:38 PM
japancrx90
S2000 Forced Induction
11
Mar 21, 2011 09:24 PM
roi
S2000 Forced Induction
4
Nov 3, 2008 08:56 AM
2QYK4U
S2000 Forced Induction
2
Oct 25, 2007 06:32 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:15 PM.